-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
adding jaysurse to cla signer #546
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new contributor entry was added to the CLA signers list in Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @jaysurse, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request facilitates new contributions by formally adding 'jaysurse' to the list of individuals who have signed the Contributor License Agreement. This is a standard procedure to ensure legal compliance for open-source projects when accepting contributions from new developers. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
CLA Verification FailedThe following contributors have not signed the Contributor License Agreement:
How to Sign
This check runs automatically. Maintainers can update |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds a new signatory to the cla-signers.json file. While the change is simple, I have two suggestions for improvement. Firstly, there is a potential privacy concern with publicly exposing a personal email address. Secondly, to improve long-term maintainability, it would be beneficial to keep the list of signers sorted alphabetically. Please see my specific comments for more details.
Suyashd999
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This pull request adds a new CLA (Contributor License Agreement) signer to the project's CLA signers configuration file.
- Adds Jay Surse (GitHub username: jaysurse) as a new individual CLA signer with signing date of January 9, 2026
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/cla-signers.json (1)
3-3: Update thelast_updatedfield to reflect today's date.Since you're adding a new CLA signer on 2026-01-09, the
last_updatedfield should be updated to match the current date.📅 Proposed fix
- "last_updated": "2026-01-03", + "last_updated": "2026-01-09",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/cla-signers.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
- GitHub Check: test (3.10)
- GitHub Check: test (3.11)
- GitHub Check: test (3.12)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/cla-signers.json (1)
189-197: LGTM! Welcome to the project.The new CLA signer entry is correctly structured with all required fields. The GitHub username matches the PR author, and the signing date is current.



Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.