Skip to content

Conversation

@tomaszkam
Copy link

TR for 4422 was already announced on the reflector.
2991 had TR poll with 5 votes.

Copy link
Member

@jwakely jwakely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These polls are all very recent, so I'd like to wait a few more days. We can keep this pull request open and merge on Monday.

@tomaszkam tomaszkam changed the title Set priorities for 4423,4422,4426,4424,2991 Set priorities for 4423,4422,4426,4424,2991,4382 Oct 23, 2025
@tomaszkam
Copy link
Author

I have added 4382, which has also had a very recent successful TR poll.

@JeffGarland
Copy link
Member

@tomaszkam are any of these issues related to NB comments? We're going to want a link to the github issue and I think at least the issue number in a note or text associated with the issue. So if any of these are it'd be great to do that now.

@jwakely I think I said I'd make a list of the above, but maybe the best this ins a PR to this repo would be the easiest?

@tomaszkam
Copy link
Author

I do not know, they were simply of the list of issues that weren't yet updated based on reflector votes.

@tomaszkam
Copy link
Author

The only one that has a chance to make an NB comment is 4382. Feel free to update the issue text and NB comment, if you find one.

@tomaszkam
Copy link
Author

It's does not seem that 4382 is attached to any NB comment.

@JeffGarland
Copy link
Member

JeffGarland commented Oct 24, 2025

cool thanks. I'll make a clone and a PR for issue links in other issue obviously this weekend.

edit: done #502

@jwakely jwakely merged commit c52f943 into cplusplus:master Oct 27, 2025
2 checks passed
@tomaszkam tomaszkam deleted the tk/meta-priorities branch October 27, 2025 10:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants