Skip to content

Set priorities for 4423,4422,4426,4424,2991,4382 #498

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 27, 2025
Merged

Set priorities for 4423,4422,4426,4424,2991,4382 #498

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
2b2670e
Set 4422 to Tentatively Ready
tomaszkam Oct 23, 2025
65261a7
Set 4426 to Tentatively Ready
tomaszkam Oct 23, 2025
9918fc5
Set 4424 to P1
tomaszkam Oct 23, 2025
8235797
Set 2991 to Tentatively Ready
tomaszkam Oct 23, 2025
cfa09bb
Set 4382 to Tentatively Ready
tomaszkam Oct 23, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
7 changes: 6 additions & 1 deletion xml/issue2991.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' standalone='no'?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "lwg-issue.dtd">

<issue num="2991" status="Open">
<issue num="2991" status="Tentatively Ready">
<title><tt>variant</tt> copy constructor missing <tt>noexcept(<i>see below</i>)</tt></title>
<section><sref ref="[variant.ctor]"/></section>
<submitter>Peter Dimov</submitter>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -84,6 +84,11 @@ variant(const variant&amp; w) <ins>noexcept(<i>see below</i>)</ins>;

<note>2025-10-20; Jonathan provides updated wording</note>


<note>2025-10-23; Reflector poll.</note>
<p>
Set status to Tentatively Ready after five votes in favour during reflector poll.
</p>
</discussion>

<resolution>
Expand Down
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion xml/issue4382.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' standalone='no'?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "lwg-issue.dtd">

<issue num="4382" status="New">
<issue num="4382" status="Tentatively Ready">
<title>The <tt>simd::basic_mask(bool)</tt> overload needs to be more constrained
</title>
<section>
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -88,6 +88,12 @@ namespace std::simd {
</superseded>

<note>2025-10-06; Matthias Kretz improves wording after reflector discussion</note>

<note>2025-10-23; Reflector poll.</note>
<p>
Set status to Tentatively Ready after seven votes in favour during reflector poll.
</p>

</discussion>

<resolution>
Expand Down
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion xml/issue4422.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' standalone='no'?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "lwg-issue.dtd">

<issue num="4422" status="New">
<issue num="4422" status="Tentatively Ready">
<title>`meta::access_context` should be a consteval-only type</title>
<section><sref ref="[meta.reflection.access.context]"/></section>
<submitter>Jakub Jelinek</submitter>
Expand All @@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ be put in paragraph 3, adjacent to 'structural'.
Also added a drive-by editorial change to paragraph 1.
</p>


<note>2025-10-23; Reflector poll.</note>
<p>
Set status to Tentatively Ready after six votes in favour during reflector poll.
</p>

</discussion>

<resolution>
Expand Down
9 changes: 8 additions & 1 deletion xml/issue4424.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
<section><sref ref="[meta.reflection.define.aggregate]"/></section>
<submitter>Jakub Jelinek</submitter>
<date>20 Oct 2025</date>
<priority>99</priority>
<priority>1</priority>

<discussion>
<p>
Expand All @@ -22,7 +22,14 @@ And what happens if you try to define a cv-qualified type:
<pre>struct S; meta::define_aggregate(^^const S, {});</pre>
Should this be an error, or inject a definition of the unqualified type?
</p>

<note>2025-10-23; Reflector poll.</note>
<p>
Set priority to 1 after reflector poll.
</p>

<superseded>

<p>
This wording is relative to <paper num="N5014"/>.
</p>
Expand Down
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion xml/issue4426.xml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' standalone='no'?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "lwg-issue.dtd">

<issue num="4426" status="New">
<issue num="4426" status="Tentatively Ready">
<title>Clarify what `meta::reflect_constant_string` considers a string literal</title>
<section><sref ref="[meta.reflection.array]"/></section>
<submitter>Jakub Jelinek</submitter>
Expand All @@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ Should it omit the `'\0'` from `string_view("abc", 3)`?
Also, "null terminator" is only defined in <sref ref="[basic.string.general]"/>
and not used for string literal objects (<sref ref="[lex.string]"/>).
</p>

<note>2025-10-23; Reflector poll.</note>
<p>
Set status to Tentatively Ready after six votes in favour during reflector poll.
</p>

</discussion>

<resolution>
Expand Down