Lane: NIH imaging | API cost: none (pure re-analysis of committed transcripts)
From an exhaustive MedQA + NIH ChestX-ray14 Gemini-only experiment design pass (six lenses: cue/stimulus, committee structure, referee/oversight, shortcut mechanism, pure re-analysis, robustness).
The finding field is on every imaging row but the paper only reports pooled contagion. Cells are small (n=35) so this is explicitly exploratory. It is pure re-analysis.
Conditions / arms
shared_adopt rate per finding (cardiomegaly 9, hernia 8, infiltration 6, effusion 3, ...) with Wilson CIs; cochran_q across findings for cue-invariance within a finding; reads imaging_cascade.jsonl + the three per-cue files.
Expected output artifact
Per-finding contagion table with CIs (exploratory).
Why this is net-new
The finding field is logged but the paper reports only pooled contagion. Not tracked.
Strengthens
Exploratory subgroup texture on claim 4.
Lane: NIH imaging | API cost: none (pure re-analysis of committed transcripts)
From an exhaustive MedQA + NIH ChestX-ray14 Gemini-only experiment design pass (six lenses: cue/stimulus, committee structure, referee/oversight, shortcut mechanism, pure re-analysis, robustness).
The finding field is on every imaging row but the paper only reports pooled contagion. Cells are small (n=35) so this is explicitly exploratory. It is pure re-analysis.
Conditions / arms
shared_adopt rate per finding (cardiomegaly 9, hernia 8, infiltration 6, effusion 3, ...) with Wilson CIs; cochran_q across findings for cue-invariance within a finding; reads imaging_cascade.jsonl + the three per-cue files.
Expected output artifact
Per-finding contagion table with CIs (exploratory).
Why this is net-new
The finding field is logged but the paper reports only pooled contagion. Not tracked.
Strengthens
Exploratory subgroup texture on claim 4.