-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Eliminate circular DTYPES dependency in RCDEF #413
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7161f7a
Initial scheme with no dtypes.h in rcdef
chipbarnaby 5bfb2ba
Debug build process
chipbarnaby 05c3147
Merge branch 'main' into rcdef-untangle
chipbarnaby db9646f
Eliminate MONTH data type; CI trial fix
chipbarnaby 77fe002
CI fix
chipbarnaby 07ff4bc
Update build-and-test.yml
chipbarnaby ae2bd8e
Update build-and-test.yml
chipbarnaby b3382b3
Update build-and-test.yml
chipbarnaby dbe7ab6
Update build-and-test.yml
chipbarnaby bf66dc8
Update build-and-test.yml
chipbarnaby 8c59532
Update build-and-test.yml
chipbarnaby 25e3ee3
Eliminate NOVRR
chipbarnaby e40ffcc
Merge branch 'rcdef-untangle' of https://github.com/cse-sim/cse into …
chipbarnaby e7ab354
Combine CI build and test into same job
chipbarnaby 3c9840a
Update build-and-test.yml
chipbarnaby 967885d
CI workflow cleanup
chipbarnaby aa236c9
Minor changes re 64 bit compilation
chipbarnaby 0047fcf
RCDEF cleanup
chipbarnaby 79f6df2
Corrections re PR comments
chipbarnaby File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this a necessary update?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CMake stuff I've read recommends putting cmake-minimum_required as the first thing in the file, so I moved it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But no particular reason to upgrade to 3.15 from 3.10?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually the change was inadvertent. I have done some reading in Professional CMake and noted many features added in 3.15 related to debugging, clang-on-Windows-support, and other things. Given that 3.15 is now 4 years old, it is not unreasonable to require it. In fact, I would advocate going much newer and learning how to exploit current features. We're a small group, it would not be a major inconvenience to move to a newer version.