[cbr79] Many VULNs 2025-01-02#797
Conversation
|
🤖 Validation Checks In Progress Workflow run: https://github.com/ctrliq/kernel-src-tree/actions/runs/20663314667 |
🔍 Upstream Linux Kernel Commit Check
This is an automated message from the kernel commit checker workflow. |
JIRA PR Check Results6 commit(s) with issues found: Commit
|
|
❌ Validation checks completed with issues View full results: https://github.com/ctrliq/kernel-src-tree/actions/runs/20663314667 |
0807c2b to
6dcbd78
Compare
|
🤖 Validation Checks In Progress Workflow run: https://github.com/ctrliq/kernel-src-tree/actions/runs/20665615394 |
🔍 Upstream Linux Kernel Commit Check
This is an automated message from the kernel commit checker workflow. |
JIRA PR Check Results3 commit(s) with issues found: Commit
|
|
❌ Validation checks completed with issues View full results: https://github.com/ctrliq/kernel-src-tree/actions/runs/20665615394 |
jira VULN-154996 cve-pre CVE-2023-53297 commit-author Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> commit 28261da Because of both sides doing L2CAP disconnection at the same time, it was possible to receive L2CAP Disconnection Response with CID that was already freed. That caused problems if CID was already reused and L2CAP Connection Request with same CID was sent out. Before this patch kernel deleted channel context regardless of the state of the channel. Example where leftover Disconnection Response (frame #402) causes local device to delete L2CAP channel which was not yet connected. This in turn confuses remote device's stack because same CID is re-used without properly disconnecting. Btmon capture before patch: ** snip ** > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 #394 [hci1] 10.748949 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 #395 [hci1] 10.749062 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 2} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #396 [hci1] 10.749073 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #397 [hci1] 10.752391 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #398 [hci1] 10.753394 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #399 [hci1] 10.756499 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #400 [hci1] 10.756548 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 26 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #401 [hci1] 10.757459 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #402 [hci1] 10.759148 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 = bluetoothd: 00:1E:AB:4C:56:54: error updating services: Input/o.. 10.759447 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #403 [hci1] 10.759386 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #404 [hci1] 10.760397 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 27 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 #405 [hci1] 10.760441 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 27 len 8 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 #406 [hci1] 10.760449 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 19 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Packets (0x13) plen 5 #407 [hci1] 10.761399 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 #408 [hci1] 10.762942 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Similar case after the patch: *snip* > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 8 #22702 [hci0] 1664.411056 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Disconnect (DISC) (0x43) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x53 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xfd < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 8 #22703 [hci0] 1664.411136 Channel: 65 len 4 [PSM 3 mode 0] {chan 3} RFCOMM: Unnumbered Ack (UA) (0x63) Address: 0x03 cr 1 dlci 0x00 Control: 0x73 poll/final 1 Length: 0 FCS: 0xd7 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22704 [hci0] 1664.411143 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22705 [hci0] 1664.414009 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22706 [hci0] 1664.415007 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22707 [hci0] 1664.418674 L2CAP: Disconnection Request (0x06) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22708 [hci0] 1664.418762 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 17 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 12 #22709 [hci0] 1664.421073 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 12 len 4 PSM: 1 (0x0001) Source CID: 65 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22710 [hci0] 1664.421371 L2CAP: Disconnection Response (0x07) ident 11 len 4 Destination CID: 65 Source CID: 65 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22711 [hci0] 1664.424082 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > HCI Event: Number of Completed Pac.. (0x13) plen 5 #22712 [hci0] 1664.425040 Num handles: 1 Handle: 43 Count: 1 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 12 #22713 [hci0] 1664.426103 L2CAP: Connection Request (0x02) ident 18 len 4 PSM: 3 (0x0003) Source CID: 65 < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 16 #22714 [hci0] 1664.426186 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 18 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) < ACL Data TX: Handle 43 flags 0x00 dlen 27 #22715 [hci0] 1664.426196 L2CAP: Configure Request (0x04) ident 13 len 19 Destination CID: 65 Flags: 0x0000 Option: Maximum Transmission Unit (0x01) [mandatory] MTU: 1013 Option: Retransmission and Flow Control (0x04) [mandatory] Mode: Basic (0x00) TX window size: 0 Max transmit: 0 Retransmission timeout: 0 Monitor timeout: 0 Maximum PDU size: 0 > ACL Data RX: Handle 43 flags 0x02 dlen 16 #22716 [hci0] 1664.428804 L2CAP: Connection Response (0x03) ident 12 len 8 Destination CID: 66 Source CID: 65 Result: Connection successful (0x0000) Status: No further information available (0x0000) *snip* Fix is to check that channel is in state BT_DISCONN before deleting the channel. This bug was found while fuzzing Bluez's OBEX implementation using Synopsys Defensics. Reported-by: Matti Kamunen <matti.kamunen@synopsys.com> Reported-by: Ari Timonen <ari.timonen@synopsys.com> Signed-off-by: Matias Karhumaa <matias.karhumaa@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> (cherry picked from commit 28261da) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-154996 cve-pre CVE-2023-53297 commit-author Manish Mandlik <mmandlik@google.com> commit 6c08fc8 There is no lock preventing both l2cap_sock_release() and chan->ops->close() from running at the same time. If we consider Thread A running l2cap_chan_timeout() and Thread B running l2cap_sock_release(), expected behavior is: A::l2cap_chan_timeout()->l2cap_chan_close()->l2cap_sock_teardown_cb() A::l2cap_chan_timeout()->l2cap_sock_close_cb()->l2cap_sock_kill() B::l2cap_sock_release()->sock_orphan() B::l2cap_sock_release()->l2cap_sock_kill() where, sock_orphan() clears "sk->sk_socket" and l2cap_sock_teardown_cb() marks socket as SOCK_ZAPPED. In l2cap_sock_kill(), there is an "if-statement" that checks if both sock_orphan() and sock_teardown() has been run i.e. sk->sk_socket is NULL and socket is marked as SOCK_ZAPPED. Socket is killed if the condition is satisfied. In the race condition, following occurs: A::l2cap_chan_timeout()->l2cap_chan_close()->l2cap_sock_teardown_cb() B::l2cap_sock_release()->sock_orphan() B::l2cap_sock_release()->l2cap_sock_kill() A::l2cap_chan_timeout()->l2cap_sock_close_cb()->l2cap_sock_kill() In this scenario, "if-statement" is true in both B::l2cap_sock_kill() and A::l2cap_sock_kill() and we hit "refcount: underflow; use-after-free" bug. Similar condition occurs at other places where teardown/sock_kill is happening: l2cap_disconnect_rsp()->l2cap_chan_del()->l2cap_sock_teardown_cb() l2cap_disconnect_rsp()->l2cap_sock_close_cb()->l2cap_sock_kill() l2cap_conn_del()->l2cap_chan_del()->l2cap_sock_teardown_cb() l2cap_conn_del()->l2cap_sock_close_cb()->l2cap_sock_kill() l2cap_disconnect_req()->l2cap_chan_del()->l2cap_sock_teardown_cb() l2cap_disconnect_req()->l2cap_sock_close_cb()->l2cap_sock_kill() l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen()->l2cap_chan_close()->l2cap_sock_teardown_cb() l2cap_sock_cleanup_listen()->l2cap_sock_kill() Protect teardown/sock_kill and orphan/sock_kill by adding hold_lock on l2cap channel to ensure that the socket is killed only after marked as zapped and orphan. Signed-off-by: Manish Mandlik <mmandlik@google.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> (cherry picked from commit 6c08fc8) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-154996 cve-pre CVE-2023-53297 commit-author Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> commit 2a15490 Prefetch channel before killing sock in order to fix UAF like BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in l2cap_sock_release+0x24c/0x290 net/bluetooth/l2cap_sock.c:1212 Read of size 8 at addr ffff8880944904a0 by task syz-fuzzer/9751 Reported-by: syzbot+c3c5bdea7863886115dc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: 6c08fc8 ("Bluetooth: Fix refcount use-after-free issue") Cc: Manish Mandlik <mmandlik@google.com> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> (cherry picked from commit 2a15490) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
6dcbd78 to
c2d3d23
Compare
|
🤖 Validation Checks In Progress Workflow run: https://github.com/ctrliq/kernel-src-tree/actions/runs/20666371071 |
🔍 Upstream Linux Kernel Commit Check
This is an automated message from the kernel commit checker workflow. |
JIRA PR Check Results1 commit(s) with issues found: Commit
|
|
✅ Validation checks completed successfully View full results: https://github.com/ctrliq/kernel-src-tree/actions/runs/20666371071 |
jira VULN-168829 cve CVE-2023-53827 commit-author Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> commit a2a9339 Similar to commit d0be834 ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free caused by l2cap_chan_put"), just use l2cap_chan_hold_unless_zero to prevent referencing a channel that is about to be destroyed. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Min Li <lm0963hack@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit a2a9339) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-154996 cve-pre CVE-2023-53297 commit-author Ying Hsu <yinghsu@chromium.org> commit 02c5ea5 L2CAP assumes that the locks conn->chan_lock and chan->lock are acquired in the order conn->chan_lock, chan->lock to avoid potential deadlock. For example, l2sock_shutdown acquires these locks in the order: mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock) l2cap_chan_lock(chan) However, l2cap_disconnect_req acquires chan->lock in l2cap_get_chan_by_scid first and then acquires conn->chan_lock before calling l2cap_chan_del. This means that these locks are acquired in unexpected order, which leads to potential deadlock: l2cap_chan_lock(c) mutex_lock(&conn->chan_lock) This patch releases chan->lock before acquiring the conn_chan_lock to avoid the potential deadlock. Fixes: a2a9339 ("Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free in l2cap_disconnect_{req,rsp}") Signed-off-by: Ying Hsu <yinghsu@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 02c5ea5) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-154996 cve CVE-2023-53297 commit-author Min Li <lm0963hack@gmail.com> commit 25e97f7 conn->chan_lock isn't acquired before l2cap_get_chan_by_scid, if l2cap_get_chan_by_scid returns NULL, then 'bad unlock balance' is triggered. Reported-by: syzbot+9519d6b5b79cf7787cf3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/000000000000894f5f05f95e9f4d@google.com/ Signed-off-by: Min Li <lm0963hack@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 25e97f7) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-155282 cve CVE-2022-50367 commit-author Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com> commit 2e488f1 upstream-diff Minor conflicts due to missing: 4a075e3 ("locks: add a new struct file_locking_context pointer to struct inode") 3d65ae4 ("writeback: initialize inode members that track writeback history") In alloc_inode, inode_init_always() could return -ENOMEM if security_inode_alloc() fails, which causes inode->i_private uninitialized. Then nilfs_is_metadata_file_inode() returns true and nilfs_free_inode() wrongly calls nilfs_mdt_destroy(), which frees the uninitialized inode->i_private and leads to crashes(e.g., UAF/GPF). Fix this by moving security_inode_alloc just prior to this_cpu_inc(nr_inodes) Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAFcO6XOcf1Jj2SeGt=jJV59wmhESeSKpfR0omdFRq+J9nD1vfQ@mail.gmail.com Reported-by: butt3rflyh4ck <butterflyhuangxx@gmail.com> Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Reported-by: Jiacheng Xu <stitch@zju.edu.cn> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@gmail.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> (cherry picked from commit 2e488f1) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
c2d3d23 to
1a219f0
Compare
|
🤖 Validation Checks In Progress Workflow run: https://github.com/ctrliq/kernel-src-tree/actions/runs/20666688255 |
|
✅ Validation checks completed successfully View full results: https://github.com/ctrliq/kernel-src-tree/actions/runs/20666688255 |
Background
We've backported the three bluetooth commits below to all of our other LTS branches:
a2a9339 Bluetooth: L2CAP: Fix use-after-free in l2cap_disconnect_{req,rsp}
02c5ea5 Bluetooth: Fix l2cap_disconnect_req deadlock
25e97f7 Bluetooth: L2CAP: fix "bad unlock balance" in l2cap_disconnect_rsp
This branch required two additional prereqs:
28261da Bluetooth: Check state in l2cap_disconnect_rsp
6c08fc8 Bluetooth: Fix refcount use-after-free issue
The fs patch below had a couple of minor conflicts when applying, but the patch content remains the same:
2e488f1 fs: fix UAF/GPF bug in nilfs_mdt_destroy
Commits
Build Log
Testing
selftest-3.10.0-1160.119.1.el7_9.ciqcbr.11.1.x86_64-1.log
selftest-3.10.0-bmastbergen_ciqcbr7_9_many-vulns-2025-01-02-0807c2b+-1.log