Updated send email to handle html body

[sinarest1608]

What does this change do? Please be clear and concise.

Changes send_email() function to handle html content in the body. Strings in body have no impact and render as usual.

Why was this change made? Including an issue number is sufficient. Otherwise, briefly explain the benefit of the change.

send_email() parsed the html code in the body as string and sent the complete code instead of rendering the html.

Verification

NA

Affirmations

All of these should have a check by them. Any exception requires an explanation.

• I have added docstrings with details on keyword arguments to new functions following the convention detailed in this gist
• I have added type hinting to new function parameters.
• I have added tests to new functions, following the rules of F.I.R.S.T..
• I matched the style of the existing code.
• I added and updated any relevant documentation (inline, README, CHANGELOG, and such).
• I used Python's type hinting.
• I ran the automated tests and ensured they ALL passed.
• I ran the linter and ensured my changes have not introduced ANY warnings or errors.
• I have made an effort to minimize code changes and have not included any cruft (preference files, *.pyc files, old comments, print-debugging, unused variables).
• I have made an effort maintain a clear commit history (haven't merged other branches or rebased improperly).
• I have written the code myself or have given credit where credit is due.

[mehuljhaver4]

• You can remove the print statements on line 98 and 101
• The code in general works as expected.
• Not sure if we will have this edge case but it fails when there's "\n" and "<some html tag>" in the body of the message.
• Example: "This is \n a Python Script. <p> Testing the script"

[sinarest1608]

@mehuljhaver4
I have removed the print statements.
Yes the edge case is a valid one but i'm also not sure if we would ever face this case.
@mbentz-uf what do you think?

[sinarest1608]

@mbentz-uf
Mehul reviewed the code but is not able to merge it. Can you help with the merge?

[michael-bentz]

@mehuljhaver4 Can you try now?

[michael-bentz]

#3 would be a nice-to-have in the future.

[mehuljhaver4]

@mehuljhaver4 Can you try now?

Merging is still blocked @mbentz-uf