We deleted many stale branches in #426 — mainly one-off content additions that were already incorporated into main. However, there is one 12-year-old branch that has some substantial features we should investigate: cugos 2.0, last updated in 2014 by @mapsam.
Some interesting potential features I see:
This belongs in a larger conversation about potentially migrating the site framework (#427), but I'm raising this issue so we can check what features we might want and eventually merge or delete the branch.
We deleted many stale branches in #426 — mainly one-off content additions that were already incorporated into
main. However, there is one 12-year-old branch that has some substantial features we should investigate:cugos 2.0, last updated in 2014 by @mapsam.Some interesting potential features I see:
This belongs in a larger conversation about potentially migrating the site framework (#427), but I'm raising this issue so we can check what features we might want and eventually merge or delete the branch.