The objective is this tool is to verify that all operations are non-failing, i.e., their evaluation does not result in a failure, if they are called with arguments satisfying the non-failing precondition of the operation.
Example:
-- The operation `head` does not fail if this condition is satisfied:
head'nonfail xs = not (null xs)
head (x:xs) = x
Note that the non-failing precondition is not a precondition for head
in the sense of contract-based programming, i.e.,
it is still allowed to use head in a logical setting.
However, it can be used to verify that the following operation
is non-failing:
readCommand = do
putStr "Input a command:"
s <- getLine
let ws = words s
if null ws then readCommand
else processCommand (head ws) (tail ws)
A detailed description can be found in the PPDP 2018 paper. Basically, the following techniques are used to verify non-failing properties:
-
Test whether the operation is pattern-completely defined (i.e., branches on all patterns in all or-branches) for all inputs satisfying the non-failing precondition. If this is not the case, the operation is possibly failing.
-
Test whether the operations called in the right-hand side are used with satisfied non-failing preconditions for all inputs satisfying the non-failing precondition.
-
Test whether a call to
Prelude.failedis unreachable, e.g., inabs x = if x>=0 then x else if x<0 then (0 - x) else failedNote that this might be the result translating the following definition:
abs x | x>=0 = x | x<0 = 0 - xThis requires reasoning on integer arithmetic, as supported by SMT solvers.
Depending on the state of the operation error,
this could also verify the absence of run-time errors:
readLine = do
putStr "Input a non-empty string:"
s <- getLine
if null s then error "Empty input!"
else do putStr "First char: "
putStrLn (head s)
If error is considered as an always failing operation
(which is done if the option --error is set),
readLine cannot be verified as non-failing.
However, this requires also a careful analysis
of all external operations (like readFile)
which might raise exceptions.
- The non-fail condition should be a Boolean formula, i.e., not a function with pattern matching or local definitions. Furthermore, it should be a first-order equation, i.e., in eta-expanded form.
-
The current implementation uses the Z3 theorem prover, i.e., the executable
z3must be in the path when using the tool. -
Contracts and non-fail conditions can also be stored in separate files. When checking a module
m, if there is a Curry modulem_SPECin the load path for modulemor in the package directoryinclude, the contents ofm_SPECis added tombefore it is checked. -
Non-fail conditions for operators can also be specified by operations named by
op_xh1...hn', where eachhiis a two digit hexadecimal number and the name of the operator corresponds to the ord values ofh1...hn. For instance, the non-fail condition for&>can be namedop_x263E'nonfail. To generate such names automatically, one can use the option--nameof the tool. -
Operations defining contracts and properties are not verified.
-
examples: some examples (and test suite)
-
include: an include file for the SMT solver and non-fail conditions for various system modules
-
src: source code of the implementation