Replies: 3 comments 5 replies
|
Thanks for the heads-up. Is there a |
|
This has taken a while, but we now have the initial The clients expects the following format: And it's currently implemented in the browser extension which got merged in bitwarden/clients#3223. It currently only affects the about page where we display the server version + a small disclaimer asking the users to confirm with the Bitwarden server implementation before reporting bugs to our issue tracker. We're hoping to add support to desktop and mobile in a bit + add the settings in the future. |
I assume It would also be nice to have while ℹ️ Automatic deletion of items in Trash is disabled. |

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Hi everyone!
The Bitwarden team is currently working on finalizing the specification of a version and configuration endpoint. This endpoint will allow us to iterate quicker with new server functionality, improve bug reporting, and to configure client capabilities such as disabling user registration or display maintenance alerts.
Alongside these changes we are also adding a
serverfield which would contain anameandurlof the server implementation, which can be used for third-party servers. This information would be used only to inform the users they are using a non-official server for bug reporting purposes. Currently be shown on the about page in each client.We understand that third-party servers have no obligation to implement the server field, but we would like to ask if this project would be willing to do so, since knowing the server implementation and version will be helpful in bug triaging which we believe will ultimately benefit everyone. This would replace the currently unused
unofficialServerfield that vaultwarden provides in identity tokens and sync responses.Below is the current draft of the response from the endpoint
Let me know if you have any thoughts or questions related to this.
All reactions