DAOS-19381 placement: tolerate DOWNOUT spare in remap chain - #18737
Closed
wangshilong wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
DAOS-19381 placement: tolerate DOWNOUT spare in remap chain#18737wangshilong wants to merge 1 commit into
wangshilong wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
A rebuild resumed by rebuild start can run an older rebuild version against a newer pool map. In that history a failed DOWN/DRAIN shard can select a spare candidate which has already transitioned to DOWNOUT. That state is valid for placement remap chaining: the selected spare is not a usable final target, but the existing code already updates the failed shard state and re-adds it to the remap list so placement can look for the next candidate. The assertion that rejects a DOWN/DRAIN failed shard remapping through a DOWNOUT spare is therefore too strict and can abort rebuild scans during interactive rebuild stop/start recovery. Replace the assertion with placement debug logging and keep the existing chained-remap behavior. Add a jump-map placement unit test that drives a DOWN shard through a spare candidate that becomes DOWNOUT and verifies placement continues to a different rebuild target. Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <shilong.wang@hpe.com>
|
Ticket title is 'Aurora engine crash - determine_valid_spares() Assertion' |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A rebuild resumed by rebuild start can run an older rebuild version against a newer pool map. In that history a failed DOWN/DRAIN shard can select a spare candidate which has already transitioned to DOWNOUT.
That state is valid for placement remap chaining: the selected spare is not a usable final target, but the existing code already updates the failed shard state and re-adds it to the remap list so placement can look for the next candidate. The assertion that rejects a DOWN/DRAIN failed shard remapping through a DOWNOUT spare is therefore too strict and can abort rebuild scans during interactive rebuild stop/start recovery.
Replace the assertion with placement debug logging and keep the existing chained-remap behavior. Add a jump-map placement unit test that drives a DOWN shard through a spare candidate that becomes DOWNOUT and verifies placement continues to a different rebuild target.
Steps for the author:
After all prior steps are complete: