Skip to content

Fix for #5448: Correct chunk size logic in map_overlap for asymmetric overlaps#5449

Merged
mrocklin merged 1 commit intodask:masterfrom
benjeffery:fix_map_overlap_with_asym_overlap
Oct 4, 2019
Merged

Fix for #5448: Correct chunk size logic in map_overlap for asymmetric overlaps#5449
mrocklin merged 1 commit intodask:masterfrom
benjeffery:fix_map_overlap_with_asym_overlap

Conversation

@benjeffery
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@benjeffery benjeffery commented Oct 2, 2019

See #5448
I've modified the test for this code as I think it was incorrect. Would appreciate another pair of eyes on it though.

  • Tests added / passed
  • Passes black dask / flake8 dask

@benjeffery benjeffery changed the title Correct chunk size logic for asymmetric overlaps Correct chunk size logic in map_overlap for asymmetric overlaps Oct 2, 2019
@benjeffery benjeffery changed the title Correct chunk size logic in map_overlap for asymmetric overlaps Fix for #5448: Correct chunk size logic in map_overlap for asymmetric overlaps Oct 2, 2019
@mrocklin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

mrocklin commented Oct 4, 2019

This looks good to me. Thank you for identifying this issue, for tracking it down, and for submitting a concise solution. Merging in.

I also notice that this is your first code contribution to this repository. Welcome!

@benjeffery
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Thanks for the merge and for dask! We met in Oxford quite a few years ago when dask was just getting started, it's been great to see it grow.

@mrocklin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

mrocklin commented Oct 4, 2019

it's been great to see it grow.

Amen to that. Thanks for chipping in.

@benjeffery benjeffery deleted the fix_map_overlap_with_asym_overlap branch October 4, 2019 10:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants