Add cross-provider database query access - #18
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
/32security-group rule that is revoked after the queryImpact
hv_db_querycan now acquire and release the appropriate bounded access mechanism for Railway, Google Cloud SQL, Amazon RDS, and Supabase. Cleanup removes only access Hypervibe created, and concurrent calls continue to share a short-lived lease.Private-only Cloud SQL and RDS instances still require an existing network path. The diagnostic call does not silently create a billable bastion, proxy, or durable network exposure.
Validation
npm test— 111 files, 946 tests passednpm run typechecknpm run buildgit diff --checkProvider API calls are mocked in the automated tests; this change did not modify live database infrastructure.