Skip to content

Put "Codex Review" header in PR review text#1762

Merged
rolandwalker merged 1 commit intomainfrom
RW/put-codex-review-in-review-description
Mar 31, 2026
Merged

Put "Codex Review" header in PR review text#1762
rolandwalker merged 1 commit intomainfrom
RW/put-codex-review-in-review-description

Conversation

@rolandwalker
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Put "Codex Review" header in PR review text, since the source is not labeled other than "github-actions".

Checklist

  • I added this contribution to the changelog.md file.
  • I added my name to the AUTHORS file (or it's already there).
  • To lint and format the code, I ran
    uv run ruff check && uv run ruff format && uv run mypy --install-types .

since the source is not labeled other than "github-actions".
@rolandwalker rolandwalker self-assigned this Mar 31, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

No blocking findings in this PR.

  • The workflow change in .github/workflows/codex-review.yml is a presentation-only change (prefixing the posted comment with ## Codex Review:) and does not alter review selection, permissions, or execution logic.
  • The changelog update in changelog.md is consistent with the workflow change.

Residual risk / gap:

  • This behavior is in GitHub Actions YAML and is not covered by automated tests, so any regressions would be detected only when the workflow runs on an actual PR.

@rolandwalker rolandwalker merged commit 7c735d6 into main Mar 31, 2026
10 checks passed
@rolandwalker rolandwalker deleted the RW/put-codex-review-in-review-description branch March 31, 2026 19:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant