|
I'm genuinely interested, how does this lib compare to other "alternative" http clients? I've heard of, used: https://lib.rs/crates/ureq and https://lib.rs/crates/minreq, what's the difference in deboa I wonder, what's the incentive? |
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
|
Deboa itself has features beyond ureq and minreq, it not only supports http1, but also supports http2 and 3. Other than that, deboa has also deboa-extras, which extends deboa with several serialization formats, SSE and websockets supports. You can also take benefit of deboa-extras, which removes some boilerplate on client usage. On top of all of this, deboa has some sister projects, like vamo and vamo-macros, which is way more rest focused and also provides bora macro, which is a kind of retrofit for rust. |
|
oh wonderful, I'll definitely keep in it mind then! |
Deboa itself has features beyond ureq and minreq, it not only supports http1, but also supports http2 and 3.
Other than that, deboa has also deboa-extras, which extends deboa with several serialization formats, SSE and websockets supports. You can also take benefit of deboa-extras, which removes some boilerplate on client usage.
On top of all of this, deboa has some sister projects, like vamo and vamo-macros, which is way more rest focused and also provides bora macro, which is a kind of retrofit for rust.