Skip to content

docs(roadmap): add Phase 2 gap analysis stories P/Q/R/S/T#337

Merged
MScottAdams merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
docs/phase2-gap-analysis-stories
Apr 13, 2026
Merged

docs(roadmap): add Phase 2 gap analysis stories P/Q/R/S/T#337
MScottAdams merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
docs/phase2-gap-analysis-stories

Conversation

@MScottAdams
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

Add 5 new stories to Phase 2 (vBRIEF Architecture Cutover) identified through gap analysis of the existing story set. Updates tier placements and Open Issues Index.

Changes

New stories added to ROADMAP.md Phase 2 tiers:

Updated existing story descriptions:

Also filed (not in this PR):

GitHub issue updates (outside this PR):

Checklist


Conversation

- Story P (#331): Ancillary doc updates for vBRIEF-centric model (Tier 2)
- Story Q (#332): Go installer rewrite for deft-directive-* namespace (Tier 3)
- Story R (#333): Validation tooling for vBRIEF-centric model (Tier 1)
- Story S (#334): Pre-cutover detection and backward compatibility guard (Tier 4)
- Story T (#335): Release and version boundary items v0.20.0 (Tier 5)
- Updated Story F (#315) description: installer scope moved to Story Q
- Updated Story G (#316) description: added dependency note on Stories B + O
- Updated Story C (#312) description: expanded migration scope
- Added all 5 new stories to Open Issues Index
@greptile-apps
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

greptile-apps Bot commented Apr 13, 2026

Greptile Summary

This PR adds 5 gap-analysis stories (P–T, issues #331#335) to the Phase 2 vBRIEF Architecture Cutover roadmap, updates descriptions for Stories C, F, and G, and adds 5 entries to the Open Issues Index. All changes are documentation-only in ROADMAP.md.

Confidence Score: 5/5

Safe to merge — documentation-only change with no code impact.

All five new story entries are internally consistent, the Open Issues Index rows are correctly numbered and formatted, and the existing story description updates accurately reflect scope movement. Both inline comments are P2 suggestions about sequencing nuances, not correctness blockers.

No files require special attention.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
ROADMAP.md Adds 5 new Phase 2 stories (P/Q/R/S/T) across all tiers, updates 3 existing story descriptions, and appends 5 rows to the Open Issues Index; all changes are internally consistent with no code impact.

Flowchart

%%{init: {'theme': 'neutral'}}%%
flowchart TD
    T1["Tier 1 — Foundation (parallelizable)\n#310 Story A · #311 Story B · #312 Story C\n#323 Story N · #324 Story O\n#333 Story R: Validation tooling (new)"]
    T2["Tier 2 — Framework Docs (depends on A)\n#313 Story D\n#331 Story P: Ancillary doc updates (new)"]
    T3["Tier 3 — Skills (depends on A + D; parallelizable)\n#314 Story E · #317 Story H · #318 Story I · #319 Story J\n#315 Story F · #316 Story G\n#332 Story Q: Go installer rewrite (new)"]
    T4["Tier 4 — CLI & Tests (depends on all above)\n#320 Story K · #321 Story L\n#334 Story S: Pre-cutover detection (new)"]
    T5["Tier 5 — Post-Cutover\n#322 Story M\n#335 Story T: Release & version boundary (new)"]

    T1 --> T2
    T2 --> T3
    T3 --> T4
    T4 --> T5
Loading
Prompt To Fix All With AI
This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: ROADMAP.md
Line: 31

Comment:
**Story R tier placement may warrant a sequencing note**

Story R's scope (scope validator, PROJECT-DEFINITION validator, folder/status consistency, epic-story links) is functionally defined by Story A's output — the validation schemas and folder conventions can't be fully spec'd until Story A lands. Placing R in the same parallelizable Tier 1 is workable but may lead to iterative rework if A's model evolves mid-implementation. Consider either noting an implicit "design-after-A" sequencing expectation in the story description, or bumping R to Tier 2 where Story D already sits for model-dependent work.

How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.

---

This is a comment left during a code review.
Path: ROADMAP.md
Line: 42

Comment:
**Story Q placed in same tier as the skills it enumerates**

Story Q lists `allSkillNames` as a deliverable, but the canonical names for the `deft-directive-*` skills are being finalized in the same Tier 3 (Stories E, F, G, H, I, J). Since all Tier 3 items are marked "parallelizable via swarm," Story Q could lock in skill names before any of the rename/rewrite stories converge. Worth adding a note on Story Q (or this entry) that the `allSkillNames` list should be treated as draft until all sibling Tier 3 stories confirm their final identifiers.

How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, please make it concise.

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "docs(roadmap): add Phase 2 gap analysis ..." | Re-trigger Greptile

@MScottAdams MScottAdams merged commit 0c7bbe8 into master Apr 13, 2026
9 checks passed
@MScottAdams MScottAdams deleted the docs/phase2-gap-analysis-stories branch April 13, 2026 17:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant