v0.2.0 — Fix the Data
Changelog
v0.2.0 (2026-08-27)
Fix the Data — Mixed-domain corpus, corrected pipeline, postmortem fixes.
Field Test
- Mixed-domain corpus: 150 artifacts across 4 domains (PR review, incident response, change management, security incidents)
- 80 PRs reused from v0.1.0 corpus with stratified selection
- 30 incident response, 20 change management, 20 security incident artifacts
- 217 debates across 4 active pair roles (primary, validation, negative control, homogeneous control)
- Total cost: $0.42
Pipeline Fixes
- Migrated all scripts from flat
pr_id-only layout to nestedartifact_id/domainlayout - Fixed
07_llm_judge.pymerge bug (keyed onpr_idinstead ofartifact_id) - Fixed
06_ground_truth.pyoutput-path parent creation - Added non-PR artifact HTML stripping and prompt size bounding
- Added corpus-aware default pair selection to
03_combine_results.pyand04_run_debate.py - Created subset corpus files for validation (
validation_subset.csv) and negative control (negative_control_subset.csv) - Updated all scripts from
v0.1.0tov0.2.0result paths
Key Findings
pair3_gpt_mistralconfirmed as the best full-corpus default pairpair1_gpt_geminiconfirmed as a weak negative control (0.033 avg convergence, 0/24 verdicts)pair5_deepseek_mistralremains stronger on subset (0.572 avg convergence)- Zero theater across all 217 debates
- Binary bar met: 2070/2333 MATCH (88.7%), 0 NO_MATCH
- Sampled flakiness: 2/2 artifacts stable at 100% verdict stability
- 2-model primary strategy validated; full 4-model matrix not needed for v0.2.0
v0.1.0 (2026-08-27)
Prove the Loop — Independent dual-review pass with bounded adversarial debate.
Features
- Independent dual-review pass with delayed revelation (F1, F2)
- Structured debate schema: Claim, Objection, Concession, UnresolvedPoint (F3)
- Bounded rounds (default 2), point-by-point enforcement (F4)
- Convergence scoring + theater detection (F5, F6)
- Joint verdict + disagreement report with
would_resolve_if(F7, F8) - PR-review domain adapter: diff parsing, chunking, metadata extraction (F9)
- BYOM provider registry: OpenAI-compatible transport, PydanticAI/LangGraph adapters, ScriptedReviewer (F10)
- SQLite persistence with schema versioning, resume, budget/backoff, crash safety
- CLI:
init,review,report,transcript,resume,list - JSONL transcript export with optional redaction
- Flakiness detection: multi-run stability reporting
Field Test Results
- 411 debates across 70 real PRs (kubernetes, prometheus, golang/go, etcd, rails, django)
- 6 model pairs × 4 models (GPT-4o-mini, Gemini 2.5 Flash, DeepSeek-V3, Mistral Small 3.2)
- Total cost: $0.53
- Binary bar PASSED: 49/49 PRs with known outcomes had ≥1 debate claim matching the actual cause
- Theater rate: 0.2% (1/411)
- Verdict stability: 96% (5-run flakiness sweep)
- Engine errors: 0
Key Findings
- Model diversity is the strongest predictor of productive debate
- The debate prompt is the critical path, not the engine
- Maximum diversity (DeepSeek+Mistral) has a dark side: 65% capitulation cascade
- Homogeneous (GPT+GPT) outperforms weak diversity (GPT+Gemini)
What's New
- Initial public release
- MIT licensed
- Python 3.11+ support