Skip to content

Conversation

@tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

Only the last commit is new, the others are borrowed from #4063.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

@tautschnig tautschnig self-assigned this Feb 7, 2019
@tautschnig tautschnig changed the title byte_extract lowering over arrays: fix bits vs bytes error [depends-on: #4063, blocks: #2068] byte_extract lowering over arrays: fix bits vs bytes error [blocks: #2068] Feb 14, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: d24e63f).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/100906780

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit 4a92ce8 into diffblue:develop Feb 14, 2019
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the byte-op-4 branch February 14, 2019 10:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants