Skip to content

Conversation

@tautschnig
Copy link
Collaborator

There is no need to create infrastructure when an existing utility can
be used instead.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

There is no need to create infrastructure when an existing utility can
be used instead.
@tautschnig tautschnig force-pushed the cleanup/remove-return_value_visitor branch from 71e5b82 to 2265264 Compare April 10, 2022 14:14
@tautschnig tautschnig added the Code Contracts Function and loop contracts label Apr 10, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 10, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #6797 (2265264) into develop (b7c6692) will increase coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 89.40%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6797      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    76.90%   76.97%   +0.06%     
===========================================
  Files         1590     1593       +3     
  Lines       183969   184099     +130     
===========================================
+ Hits        141486   141713     +227     
+ Misses       42483    42386      -97     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...rc/goto-instrument/contracts/memory_predicates.cpp 83.52% <ø> (-0.57%) ⬇️
src/goto-instrument/contracts/memory_predicates.h 100.00% <ø> (ø)
..._incremental/smt2_incremental_decision_procedure.h 75.00% <ø> (ø)
...c/solvers/smt2_incremental/convert_expr_to_smt.cpp 84.87% <76.74%> (+12.78%) ⬆️
src/solvers/smt2_incremental/object_tracking.cpp 97.87% <97.87%> (ø)
src/goto-instrument/contracts/contracts.cpp 93.84% <100.00%> (ø)
src/goto-programs/goto_function.cpp 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/solvers/smt2_incremental/object_tracking.h 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ncremental/smt2_incremental_decision_procedure.cpp 94.15% <100.00%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
...t/solvers/smt2_incremental/convert_expr_to_smt.cpp 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 8 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1a4c66e...2265264. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@SaswatPadhi SaswatPadhi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! Thanks

@tautschnig tautschnig merged commit 51cfb53 into diffblue:develop Apr 10, 2022
@tautschnig tautschnig deleted the cleanup/remove-return_value_visitor branch April 10, 2022 17:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cleanup Code Contracts Function and loop contracts

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants