docs: surface observability RFCs and scope - #64
Merged
Conversation
dinpd
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 28, 2026 17:25
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #63
Summary
User and contributor impact
Repository visitors can now discover the action-boundary evidence RFC, outcome-observability RFC, feedback threads, and milestone-scoped execution plan directly from the landing page. The wording preserves AgentPass's runtime-gate identity and does not represent either RFC as an adopted standard.
Acceptance evidence
git diff --check— passedagent-observability,intent-assurance, andopentelemetrytopics are liveSecurity and review
About metadata
The repository About metadata is not represented in the Git diff. It was updated through GitHub as part of #63 and verified after the change.