This repository was archived by the owner on Oct 12, 2022. It is now read-only.
eliminate some redundancy in rt_init() - #581
Closed
WalterBright wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rethrow doesn't make sense as rt_init/rt_term is intended to be used from C.
Member
Author
|
In general, the logic to recover from exceptions thrown during initialization needs much work. For example, when module constructors throw, as part of the recovery process, the module destructors for all the module constructors that have already succeeded need to be run. This is just a step in that direction (I'm working on dynamic loading of DLLs). |
Member
Author
|
@dawgfoto, after much thought, it seems inevitable to me that the rt_init() code needs to be run by the calls to functions in the .ctors section. |
Member
Author
|
Obsoleted by pull #583 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.