Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Either one works. Nothing about how SpecBinder reads your spec or generates your tests changes
between them, and you can switch later by renaming the file.

.specb is SpecBinder's own extension, and the one used throughout these docs and examples.
Nothing else claims it, so a .specb file is unambiguously a SpecBinder spec — which is what
keeps it out of the way of other tools.

That shows up most clearly in IntelliJ. SpecBinder has a companion IntelliJ plugin (optional —
your tests are generated with or without it) that adds editor support for spec files: clicking
through from a step to the code behind it, run buttons in the left margin, pass/fail marks after
a run. The Cucumber/Gherkin plu…

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by dmytro-stasyuk
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
1 participant