Conversation
|
😦 Looks like these auto-fixes aren't without their bugs… Ugh. |
|
I was able to find a way to automate applying most of the fixes. It's not 100%, and a few of the documentation fixes are weird (e.g. SA1642). I'm going to try another round of automatically applying fixes and pinpoint the ones that cause compile problems. |
|
Alright, build succeeded. 55,464 warnings instead of 194,461 warnings on the previous build. Also shaved 7 minutes off the build. I'm going to manually apply/fix some of the auto-fixes that caused build errors. Y'all can merge this now and I'll push those changes as a separate PR, or I can push to this PR if nothing's moved on it before I'm done. |
valadas
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I did a "spot check", it looks fine to me and I resolved 2 small conflicts. Looks good to me
|
Hmm, we have a new error, not sure if caused by my fixing of conflicts, they where pretty basic to resolve... |
|
Thanks @valadas! I've just pushed a change which should fix it. One side moved the |
|
Also, with the SA1200 change, we're down to 36,883 warnings. |
|
Oh, sorry, my bad :) /azp run |
|
/azp run |
|
No pipelines are associated with this pull request. |
|
Cool, it builds :) Can we get a second approver @dnnsoftware/approvers |
|
Yessir |

Most of the auto-fixes