Type of issue
Missing information
Description
This section should also mention pinning the SDK as was done in #53347 for the global.json docs
(Are there more pages where either lock files or global.json version selection is mentioned? If so they would also be good candidates to get the same notice)
Rationale from the linked issue above:
see comment from Microsoft(Chet) here dotnet/sdk#48795 (comment)
Our current recommendation for users that use lock files is to also lock their SDK versions via global.json with no rollforward, >so they(sic) their entire toolchain stays in lockstep.
Linking to an issue to track for when that recommendation changes would be preferable or at least the specific issues which >most users run into which require pinning the SDK in relation to lock-files
dotnet/aspnetcore#65061
dotnet/sdk#48795
It will aid in discovery of this fact
Ideally the blog post https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/enable-repeatable-package-restores-using-a-lock-file/ is also updated
Page URL
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/install/upgrade#package-lock-files
Content source URL
https://github.com/dotnet/docs/blob/main/docs/core/install/upgrade.md
Document Version Independent Id
a20fa96c-6d92-d941-f6d0-bf0369028e7f
Platform Id
16950b17-b581-c2c6-3825-a45465ac0617
Article author
@adegeo
Metadata
- ID: 327f5330-9be0-25fe-1e75-3673f7809d0d
- PlatformId: 16950b17-b581-c2c6-3825-a45465ac0617
- Service: dotnet-fundamentals
- Sub-service: install
Related Issues
Type of issue
Missing information
Description
This section should also mention pinning the SDK as was done in #53347 for the
global.jsondocs(Are there more pages where either lock files or
global.jsonversion selection is mentioned? If so they would also be good candidates to get the same notice)Rationale from the linked issue above:
Page URL
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/install/upgrade#package-lock-files
Content source URL
https://github.com/dotnet/docs/blob/main/docs/core/install/upgrade.md
Document Version Independent Id
a20fa96c-6d92-d941-f6d0-bf0369028e7f
Platform Id
16950b17-b581-c2c6-3825-a45465ac0617
Article author
@adegeo
Metadata
Related Issues