Refactor the first static constructor example #50130
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dotnet-policy-service
bot
added
dotnet-csharp/svc
fundamentals/subsvc
community-contribution
BillWagner
approved these changes
Nov 26, 2025
Member
BillWagner
left a comment
BillWagner
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks @Xulei-NL
This LGTM, and I'll 
now.
You should see the changes on the live site in the next day or two, on our regular publishing cycle. 🎆
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Refactor the first static constructor example to demonstrate we can initialize static fields in two ways.
For more information about the discussion between me and Bill, see #50089.
Fixes #50089