Consider annotations on the list of types (?)

[kant2002]

Consider this configuration

internal List<Type> InterceptorProviders { get; } = [typeof(Server.Interceptors.ServerSide.RevalidatingInterceptor)];

And the code whcih use this configuration

foreach (Type interceptorType in config.DataPortalOptions.DataPortalServerOptions.InterceptorProviders)
{
  services.AddScoped(typeof(IInterceptDataPortal), interceptorType);
}

There no way how I can say that List of Types will contain only types with specific DAM properties. I think having that would still be statically analyzeable.

[dotnet-policy-service]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/illink
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

[MichalStrehovsky]

This would require annotating not just list of the types, but also the enumerator and IEnumerable.

If you want a workaround, we've been using patterns like this:

struct ListOfActivatableTypes
{
    private readonly List<Type> _activatableTypes = new List<Type>();

    public ListOfActivatableTypes() { }

    public void Add([DynamicallyAccessedMembers(DynamicallyAccessedMemberTypes.PublicParameterlessConstructor)] Type type)
        => _activatableTypes.Add(type);

    public Enumerator GetEnumerator() => new Enumerator(this);

    public struct Enumerator : IEnumerator<Type>
    {
        private List<Type>.Enumerator _enumerator;

        public Enumerator(ListOfActivatableTypes list) => _enumerator = list._activatableTypes.GetEnumerator();

        public bool MoveNext() => _enumerator.MoveNext();

        public void Reset() => ((IEnumerator)_enumerator).Reset();
        public void Dispose() => _enumerator.Dispose();

        [UnconditionalSuppressMessage("", "IL2073", Justification = "We ensure only annotated things are added")]
        [UnconditionalSuppressMessage("", "IL2093", Justification = "The annotation is on the return type and shouldn't matter")]
        [DynamicallyAccessedMembers(DynamicallyAccessedMemberTypes.PublicParameterlessConstructor)]
        public Type Current => _enumerator.Current;
        object IEnumerator.Current => Current;
    }
}

It requires warning suppressions, but the invariants are relatively easy to ensure since it's pretty compact.

[kant2002]

Thank you. That's nice workaround, but this is business orienter project, so I don't know can it fly or not. Anyway, thanks for your help, I think it's really nice way to move forward, since that's internal property.

[vitek-karas]

Another solution which we've also used it to wrap the Type into a struct:

    struct ActivatableType
    {
        public ActivatableType([DynamicallyAccessedMembers(DynamicallyAccessedMemberTypes.PublicParameterlessConstructor)] Type type)
        {
            this.type = type;
        }

        [DynamicallyAccessedMembers(DynamicallyAccessedMemberTypes.PublicParameterlessConstructor)]
        public Type type;
    }

    List<ActivatableType> InterceptorProviders { get; } = [new ActivatableType(typeof(string))];

    void TestIt()
    {
        foreach (var i in InterceptorProviders)
        {
            Activator.CreateInstance(i.type); // No warning

            i.type.GetMethods(); // Warns
        }
    }

The usage is a bit worse, but it doesn't require any suppressions and you can use any collection type with it.