Consider aging dependent handles the same way as the other kinds of handles.

[VSadov]

We do not age dependent handles like all other kinds of handles. As a result dependent handles stay in Gen 0 and get visited on every GC. That is unnecessary work when dependent handles refer to tenured objects, which is a common case.

Related to PR: #78746

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this issue. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/gc
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

Issue Details

---

We do not age dependent handles like all other kinds of handles. As a result dependent handles stay in Gen 0 and get visited on every GC. That is unnecessary work when dependent handles refer to tenured objects, which is a common case.

Related to PR: #78746

Author:	VSadov
Assignees:	-
Labels:	area-GC-coreclr
Milestone:	Future