Implement ProcessStartInfo.KillOnParentExit for Windows by Copilot · Pull Request #126699 · dotnet/runtime

Copilot · 2026-04-09T11:20:47Z

Description

Implements the ProcessStartInfo.KillOnParentExit property for Windows, which terminates child processes when the parent process exits. This is the Windows part of the KillOnParentExit feature.

API approved at #125838 (comment)

Changes Made

New API surface:

Added KillOnParentExit property to ProcessStartInfo with [SupportedOSPlatform("windows")] attribute (linux support will be added in upcoming PRs)
Added to reference assembly (ref/System.Diagnostics.Process.cs) with matching [SupportedOSPlatformAttribute("windows")]
Added XML documentation

Windows implementation (SafeProcessHandle.Windows.cs):

Added a lazily-initialized static SafeJobHandle with JOB_OBJECT_LIMIT_KILL_ON_JOB_CLOSE flag, shared across all child processes with KillOnParentExit=true
For CreateProcess path (no user credentials): uses PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_JOB_LIST in the extended startup info for atomic job assignment at process creation
For CreateProcessWithLogonW path (with user credentials): starts the process suspended, assigns it to the job object via AssignProcessToJobObject, then resumes the thread only on the happy path — on failure, the suspended process is terminated
ResumeThread return value is checked; failure throws Win32Exception and the suspended process is terminated
Extended BuildProcThreadAttributeList to support both PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_HANDLE_LIST and PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_JOB_LIST attributes
Uses string.IsNullOrEmpty(startInfo.UserName) for defensive checks when determining the code path

P/Invoke definitions (Interop.JobObjects.cs):

CreateJobObjectW, SetInformationJobObject, AssignProcessToJobObject, ResumeThread
JOBOBJECT_EXTENDED_LIMIT_INFORMATION, IO_COUNTERS, JOBOBJECTINFOCLASS structs/enums
SafeJobHandle, PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_JOB_LIST constant

Validation:

Extended ProcessStartInfo.ThrowIfInvalid to throw InvalidOperationException when KillOnParentExit is combined with UseShellExecute
Added KillOnParentExitCannotBeUsedWithUseShellExecute string resource

Tests (KillOnParentExitTests.cs):

KillOnParentExit_DefaultsToFalse / KillOnParentExit_CanBeSetToTrue — property basics
KillOnParentExit_WithUseShellExecute_Throws — validation test
KillOnParentExit_ProcessStartsAndExitsNormally — smoke test
KillOnParentExit_KillsTheChild_WhenParentExits — verifies child is killed (enabled=true) or survives (enabled=false) on normal parent exit, reports grandchild pid via stdout
KillOnParentExit_KillsTheChild_WhenParentIsKilled — same when parent is forcefully killed
KillOnParentExit_KillsTheChild_WhenParentCrashes — same when parent crashes (access violation)
KillOnParentExit_WithUserCredentials — exercises the CreateProcessWithLogonW + suspended + job assignment path using a Windows test account (admin/OuterLoop)
VerifyProcessIsRunning uses polling with Environment.TickCount64 and a 10-second timeout to avoid flaky assertions from PID reuse on Windows

Add KillOnParentExit property to ProcessStartInfo that terminates child processes when the parent process exits. Windows implementation uses Job Objects with JOB_OBJECT_LIMIT_KILL_ON_JOB_CLOSE flag. For CreateProcess: uses PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_JOB_LIST for atomic assignment. For CreateProcessWithLogonW: starts suspended, assigns to job, then resumes. Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/sessions/61612ca1-930c-4836-8554-d143d05c8321 Co-authored-by: adamsitnik <6011991+adamsitnik@users.noreply.github.com>

dotnet-policy-service · 2026-04-09T11:40:45Z

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-diagnostics-process
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

adamsitnik

@copilot address my feedback

...ries/System.Diagnostics.Process/src/Microsoft/Win32/SafeHandles/SafeProcessHandle.Windows.cs

src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/tests/KillOnParentExitTests.cs

…py path, add user credentials test, fix pid reporting via stdout, remove nop UseShellExecute test Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/sessions/c4dd95b4-cd8e-4740-83f9-7358444c04ce Co-authored-by: adamsitnik <6011991+adamsitnik@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot · 2026-04-09T12:51:22Z

@copilot address my feedback

All feedback addressed in 31f6e6b. All 403 tests pass.

- simplify the tests - avoid duplication!!

Copilot

Pull request overview

Implements Windows support for ProcessStartInfo.KillOnParentExit by using Windows Job Objects to ensure spawned processes are terminated when the parent exits.

Changes:

Added ProcessStartInfo.KillOnParentExit API surface (implementation + ref assembly) and validation against UseShellExecute.
Implemented Windows job-object based process start paths (CreateProcess job-list attribute, and CreateProcessWithLogonW suspended + assign + resume).
Added Windows-focused tests validating the behavior.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 10 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated 6 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/tests/System.Diagnostics.Process.Tests.csproj	Includes the new KillOnParentExit test file in the test project.
src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/tests/ProcessStartInfoTests.cs	Extends existing Windows credential tests to cover KillOnParentExit on that path.
src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/tests/KillOnParentExitTests.cs	Adds new Windows tests validating KillOnParentExit behavior under various parent-exit scenarios.
src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/src/System/Diagnostics/ProcessStartInfo.cs	Adds the KillOnParentExit property, docs, and validation with UseShellExecute.
src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/src/System.Diagnostics.Process.csproj	Links in the new Windows job-object interop file.
src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/src/Resources/Strings.resx	Adds a resource string for the KillOnParentExit + UseShellExecute validation.
src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/src/Microsoft/Win32/SafeHandles/SafeProcessHandle.Windows.cs	Windows implementation: shared job handle, job-list attribute support, and logon path job assignment.
src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/ref/System.Diagnostics.Process.cs	Adds the KillOnParentExit property to the reference assembly surface.
src/libraries/Common/src/Interop/Windows/Kernel32/Interop.JobObjects.cs	Adds required job-object P/Invokes/structs/constants.
src/libraries/Common/src/Interop/Windows/Advapi32/Interop.ProcessOptions.cs	Adds CREATE_SUSPENDED for the CreateProcessWithLogonW suspended-start path.

src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/src/System/Diagnostics/ProcessStartInfo.cs

src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/ref/System.Diagnostics.Process.cs

...ries/System.Diagnostics.Process/src/Microsoft/Win32/SafeHandles/SafeProcessHandle.Windows.cs

src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/tests/KillOnParentExitTests.cs

github-actions · 2026-04-09T14:36:54Z

🤖 Copilot Code Review — PR #126699

Note

This review was generated by GitHub Copilot.

Holistic Assessment

Motivation: Adding ProcessStartInfo.KillOnParentExit addresses a real, well-understood need — ensuring child processes don't become orphans when their parent exits or crashes. This is a frequently requested feature with clear real-world use cases (build systems, process supervisors, test harnesses).

Approach: The Windows implementation using Job Objects with JOB_OBJECT_LIMIT_KILL_ON_JOB_CLOSE is the correct, well-established pattern. The dual code paths — PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_JOB_LIST for CreateProcess (atomic assignment) and CREATE_SUSPENDED + assign + resume for CreateProcessWithLogonW (which doesn't support extended startup info) — are both the canonical approaches for their respective scenarios. The shared singleton job object avoids per-process overhead.

Summary: ⚠️ Needs Human Review. The Windows implementation is solid and well-tested. However, there are two design-level questions that require human judgment: (1) whether this new public API has completed the API approval process, and (2) whether the intentional lack of [SupportedOSPlatform("windows")] reflects an approved cross-platform API design where Unix support is planned, or is an oversight. A human reviewer should verify API approval status and confirm the cross-platform strategy.

Detailed Findings

⚠️ API Approval — No linked `api-approved` issue found

This PR adds new public API surface:

// ref assembly
public bool KillOnParentExit { get { throw null; } set { } }

Per dotnet/runtime convention, new public APIs require an approved proposal before PR submission. I was unable to find a linked api-approved issue in the PR description or commit messages. The PR author (adamsitnik) is a maintainer who would know this process, so this may have been handled through channels not visible here (e.g., an API review meeting or a linked issue I couldn't locate).

Action: A human reviewer should verify that this API shape has been formally approved.

⚠️ Cross-Platform Behavior — Silently ignored on Unix

The property is defined in the shared ProcessStartInfo.cs (not in platform-specific files) without any [SupportedOSPlatform("windows")] attribute. This is inconsistent with how other Windows-only properties are handled in this class:

Property	`[SupportedOSPlatform("windows")]`	Throws PNSE on Unix
`CreateNewProcessGroup`	✅ Yes (both ref and src)	✅ Yes
`LoadUserProfile`	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
`Domain`	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
`Password`	✅ Yes	✅ Yes
`KillOnParentExit`	❌ No	❌ No
`InheritedHandles`	❌ No (cross-platform)	N/A (implemented on both)

The XML documentation says "On Windows, this is implemented using Job Objects" — which could imply cross-platform support is planned (Linux has prctl(PR_SET_PDEATHSIG), macOS has kqueue with EVFILT_PROC). If that's the intent, the current behavior (silently ignored on Unix) is reasonable as a stepping stone. If Unix support is not planned, the property should follow the established pattern with [SupportedOSPlatform("windows")] and throw PlatformNotSupportedException on Unix.

Action: A human reviewer should confirm the intended cross-platform strategy. If Unix support is planned, a tracking issue should exist. If not, the property should be decorated with [SupportedOSPlatform("windows")] and throw PNSE on Unix via ProcessStartInfo.Unix.cs.

💡 `ResumeThread` Return Value — Not checked

In AssignJobAndResumeThread (SafeProcessHandle.Windows.cs line 608):

Interop.Kernel32.ResumeThread(processInfo.hThread);

ResumeThread returns (DWORD)-1 on failure. If it fails, the child process remains suspended indefinitely. While this is extremely unlikely with a valid thread handle from CreateProcessWithLogonW, checking the return value and handling the error (terminate the suspended process) would be more defensive:

if (Interop.Kernel32.ResumeThread(processInfo.hThread) == -1)
{
    Interop.Kernel32.TerminateProcess(procSH, -1);
    throw new Win32Exception(Marshal.GetLastWin32Error());
}

This is a low-probability concern but aligns with the defensive error handling already present in this method.

✅ Windows Implementation — Correct and well-structured

The implementation handles both code paths correctly:

CreateProcess path: Uses PROC_THREAD_ATTRIBUTE_JOB_LIST for atomic job assignment — the child process is in the job from its very first instruction. No window for orphaning.
CreateProcessWithLogonW path: Correctly uses CREATE_SUSPENDED → AssignProcessToJobObject → ResumeThread. The error recovery (TerminateProcess in the catch block) ensures no zombie suspended processes are left behind.
Singleton job object: Lazy<T> provides thread-safe, once-only initialization. The SafeJobHandle is intentionally never disposed (rooted by the static field) — this is correct since the OS automatically destroys the job and kills its processes when the parent exits.
DangerousGetHandle(): Safe here because the Lazy<T> roots the SafeJobHandle for the process lifetime, so GC cannot collect it.
Thread handle closure: Correctly moved to the finally block to ensure cleanup even when AssignJobAndResumeThread throws.

✅ Interop Definitions — Correct

The Job Object structs (IO_COUNTERS, JOBOBJECT_BASIC_LIMIT_INFORMATION, JOBOBJECT_EXTENDED_LIMIT_INFORMATION) are correctly laid out with [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)]. P/Invoke signatures use SetLastError = true and [return: MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.Bool)] where appropriate. The SafeJobHandle correctly extends SafeHandleZeroOrMinusOneIsInvalid.

✅ Validation Logic — Correct

The ThrowIfInvalid method properly prevents combining KillOnParentExit with UseShellExecute. The useExtendedStartupInfo condition correctly avoids using extended startup info when UserName is set (since CreateProcessWithLogonW doesn't support it), falling back to the suspended-process approach.

✅ Test Coverage — Comprehensive for Windows

Tests cover:

Default value (false) and set/get
UseShellExecute incompatibility (throws InvalidOperationException)
Normal process start and exit with KillOnParentExit=true
Child killed when parent exits normally (WhenParentExits)
Child killed when parent is killed (WhenParentIsKilled)
Child killed when parent crashes via access violation (WhenParentCrashes)
Both enabled=true and enabled=false paths via [Theory]/[InlineData]
User credentials path (TestUserCredentialsPropertiesOnWindows) — tests the CreateProcessWithLogonW suspended-process code path

All tests are correctly marked [PlatformSpecific(TestPlatforms.Windows)].

💡 Lazy(T) Exception Caching — Acceptable but worth noting

If CreateJobObjectW or SetInformationJobObject fails during the first KillOnParentExit process start, the Lazy<T> default mode (ExecutionAndPublication) caches the exception permanently. All subsequent KillOnParentExit=true starts will fail with the same cached exception, even if the underlying system condition was transient. This is acceptable since these calls only fail under extreme system conditions (out of handles/memory), where retrying is unlikely to help.

Generated by Code Review for issue #126699 · ◷

adamsitnik

@copilot address my feedback

src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/ref/System.Diagnostics.Process.cs

...ries/System.Diagnostics.Process/src/Microsoft/Win32/SafeHandles/SafeProcessHandle.Windows.cs

src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/src/System/Diagnostics/ProcessStartInfo.cs

src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/tests/KillOnParentExitTests.cs

…sumeThread return, remove unused using, improve VerifyProcessIsRunning polling Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/sessions/06c58cfa-bdef-4f35-9345-9ab03e7dc542 Co-authored-by: adamsitnik <6011991+adamsitnik@users.noreply.github.com>

Copilot · 2026-04-09T16:17:49Z

@copilot address my feedback

All feedback addressed in cc04598. Source builds and all 401 tests pass.

adamsitnik · 2026-04-09T18:22:49Z

src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/src/System/Diagnostics/ProcessStartInfo.cs

+        /// </remarks>
+        /// <value><see langword="true"/> to terminate the child process when the parent exits; otherwise, <see langword="false"/>. The default is <see langword="false"/>.</value>
+        [SupportedOSPlatform("windows")]
+        public bool KillOnParentExit { get; set; }


to other reviewers: I did not bother throwing PNSE right now as I intend to add Unix support in upcoming PR

adamsitnik · 2026-04-09T18:30:24Z

src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/tests/KillOnParentExitTests.cs

+            VerifyProcessIsRunning(enabled, grandChildPid);
+        }
+
+        private static void VerifyProcessIsRunning(bool shouldBeKilled, int processId)


to other reviewers: I've opened #126727 to make it easier to perform similar checks

adamsitnik · 2026-04-09T18:31:07Z

/azp list

azure-pipelines · 2026-04-09T18:31:14Z

CI/CD Pipelines for this repository: runtime-coreclr outerloop runtime-coreclr jitstress runtime-coreclr jitstressregs runtime-coreclr jitstress2-jitstressregs runtime-coreclr gcstress0x3-gcstress0xc runtime-coreclr gcstress-extra runtime-coreclr r2r-extra runtime-coreclr jitstress-isas-x86 runtime-coreclr jitstress-isas-arm runtime-coreclr jitstressregs-x86 runtime-coreclr libraries-jitstressregs runtime-coreclr libraries-jitstress2-jitstressregs runtime-coreclr r2r runtime-coreclr runincontext runtime-coreclr crossgen2 runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop-windows runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop-linux runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop-osx runtime runtime-libraries enterprise-linux runtime-libraries stress-http runtime-libraries stress-ssl runtime-dev-innerloop runtime-coreclr crossgen2 outerloop coreclr-release-outerloop-nightly runtime-coreclr crossgen2-composite runtime-jit-experimental runtime-coreclr libraries-jitstress dotnet-linker-tests runtime-coreclr ilasm runtime-coreclr crossgen2-composite gcstress runtime-coreclr pgo runtime-coreclr libraries-pgo Antigen runtime-community Fuzzlyn runtime-coreclr superpmi-replay runtime-wasm runtime-coreclr superpmi-diffs runtime-coreclr superpmi-asmdiffs-checked-release runtime-extra-platforms jit-cfg runtime-wasm-perf runtime-llvm runtime-cet runtime-coreclr jitstress-random runtime-coreclr libraries-jitstress-random runtime-wasm-non-libtests runtime-android runtime-androidemulator runtime-ioslike runtime-ioslikesimulator runtime-linuxbionic runtime-maccatalyst runtime-coreclr pgostress runtime-coreclr jitstress-isas-avx512 runtime-libraries-mono outerloop runtime-sanitized runtime-wasm-dbgtests runtime-wasm-optional runtime-nativeaot-outerloop runtime-coreclr superpmi-collect-test runtime-diagnostics runtime-interpreter runtime-report-green runtime-coreclr hardware-intrinsics runtime-libraries-interpreter runtime-vmr-validation

adamsitnik · 2026-04-09T18:31:42Z

/azp run runtime-libraries-coreclr outerloop-windows

azure-pipelines · 2026-04-09T18:31:59Z

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

adamsitnik · 2026-04-09T18:33:00Z

...ries/System.Diagnostics.Process/src/Microsoft/Win32/SafeHandles/SafeProcessHandle.Windows.cs

                    Debug.Assert(!hasInheritedHandles, "Inheriting handles is not supported when starting with alternate credentials.");
                    Debug.Assert(startupInfoEx.StartupInfo.cb == sizeof(Interop.Kernel32.STARTUPINFO));

+                    // When KillOnParentExit is set and we use CreateProcessWithLogonW (which doesn't support


@jkotas For most of it, this PR is just a subset of #124375. This is the new part

jkotas · 2026-04-09T23:20:10Z

src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/src/System/Diagnostics/ProcessStartInfo.cs

+        /// This property cannot be used together with <see cref="UseShellExecute"/> set to <see langword="true"/>.
+        /// </para>
+        /// <para>
+        /// On Windows, this is implemented using Job Objects with the <c>JOB_OBJECT_LIMIT_KILL_ON_JOB_CLOSE</c> flag.


Add a link to Windows SDK description of this flag

jkotas · 2026-04-09T23:25:59Z

...ries/System.Diagnostics.Process/src/Microsoft/Win32/SafeHandles/SafeProcessHandle.Windows.cs

            }

-            if (handleCount > 0 && !Interop.Kernel32.UpdateProcThreadAttribute(
+            if (handlesToInherit is not null && handleCount > 0 && !Interop.Kernel32.UpdateProcThreadAttribute(


Suggested change

if (handlesToInherit is not null && handleCount > 0 && !Interop.Kernel32.UpdateProcThreadAttribute(

if (handleCount > 0 && !Interop.Kernel32.UpdateProcThreadAttribute(

This looks unnecessary

jkotas · 2026-04-09T23:35:43Z

src/libraries/System.Diagnostics.Process/tests/KillOnParentExitTests.cs

+
+            string firstLine = childHandle.Process.StandardOutput.ReadLine();
+            int grandChildPid = int.Parse(firstLine);
+            childHandle.Process.StandardInput.WriteLine("One AccessViolationException please.");


Are these intentionally crashing processes going to produce crash dumps? We tend to have a problem with these. The crash dumps fill disk on Helix machines.

See #113732

Do we need to do something similar here?

Copilot AI assigned Copilot and adamsitnik Apr 9, 2026

Copilot AI requested review from Copilot and removed request for Copilot April 9, 2026 11:20

Copilot created this pull request from a session on behalf of adamsitnik April 9, 2026 11:20 View session

github-actions bot added the area-System.Diagnostics.Process label Apr 9, 2026

adamsitnik reviewed Apr 9, 2026

View reviewed changes

Copilot started work on behalf of adamsitnik April 9, 2026 12:09 View session

adamsitnik added this to the 11.0.0 milestone Apr 9, 2026

adamsitnik added the NO-REVIEW Experimental/testing PR, do NOT review it label Apr 9, 2026

Copilot AI requested review from Copilot and removed request for Copilot April 9, 2026 12:50

Copilot AI changed the title ~~Implementing KillOnParentExit property in ProcessStartInfo class~~ Implement ProcessStartInfo.KillOnParentExit for Windows Apr 9, 2026

Copilot finished work on behalf of adamsitnik April 9, 2026 12:53

Copilot AI requested a review from adamsitnik April 9, 2026 12:53

address my own feedback:

b910623

- simplify the tests - avoid duplication!!

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 9, 2026 14:13

adamsitnik marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2026 14:20

Copilot AI reviewed Apr 9, 2026

View reviewed changes

adamsitnik reviewed Apr 9, 2026

View reviewed changes

Copilot started work on behalf of adamsitnik April 9, 2026 15:39 View session

Copilot AI requested a review from adamsitnik April 9, 2026 17:06

Copilot finished work on behalf of adamsitnik April 9, 2026 17:06

adamsitnik reviewed Apr 9, 2026

View reviewed changes

adamsitnik removed the NO-REVIEW Experimental/testing PR, do NOT review it label Apr 9, 2026

adamsitnik requested a review from jkotas April 9, 2026 18:31

adamsitnik reviewed Apr 9, 2026

View reviewed changes

jkotas reviewed Apr 9, 2026

View reviewed changes

	if (handlesToInherit is not null && handleCount > 0 && !Interop.Kernel32.UpdateProcThreadAttribute(
	if (handleCount > 0 && !Interop.Kernel32.UpdateProcThreadAttribute(

Conversation

Copilot AI commented Apr 9, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Description

Changes Made

Uh oh!

dotnet-policy-service bot commented Apr 9, 2026

Uh oh!

adamsitnik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI commented Apr 9, 2026

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull request overview

Reviewed changes

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2026

🤖 Copilot Code Review — PR #126699

Holistic Assessment

Detailed Findings

⚠️ API Approval — No linked api-approved issue found

⚠️ Cross-Platform Behavior — Silently ignored on Unix

💡 ResumeThread Return Value — Not checked

✅ Windows Implementation — Correct and well-structured

✅ Interop Definitions — Correct

✅ Validation Logic — Correct

✅ Test Coverage — Comprehensive for Windows

💡 Lazy(T) Exception Caching — Acceptable but worth noting

Uh oh!

adamsitnik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI commented Apr 9, 2026

Uh oh!

adamsitnik Apr 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

adamsitnik Apr 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

adamsitnik commented Apr 9, 2026

Uh oh!

azure-pipelines bot commented Apr 9, 2026

Uh oh!

adamsitnik commented Apr 9, 2026

Uh oh!

azure-pipelines bot commented Apr 9, 2026

Uh oh!

adamsitnik Apr 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jkotas Apr 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jkotas Apr 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jkotas Apr 9, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Copilot AI commented Apr 9, 2026 •

edited

Loading

⚠️ API Approval — No linked `api-approved` issue found

💡 `ResumeThread` Return Value — Not checked