-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Responsible Use
Multi-camera evidence fusion can affect privacy, civil liberties and consequential decisions.
IncidentGraph should be used only with lawfully acquired data, appropriate access controls, retention policies and human oversight.
A graph edge is an evidentiary hypothesis. It is not automatically:
- a declaration of guilt;
- proof of intent;
- a protected-attribute inference;
- a substitute for human review.
Sensor gaps must remain explicit. Absence of an observation must not be rewritten as proof that an event did not occur.
Low-confidence or contradictory hypotheses should be surfaced to a reviewer rather than collapsed into an automated adverse action.
Do not infer sensitive or protected attributes that were not legitimately collected for the authorized task.
Never publish private video, credentials, personal identifiers, restricted annotations or raw evidence paths that expose individuals or infrastructure.
Always distinguish real-data component results from controlled synthetic system diagnostics. Claim boundaries are part of responsible scientific use.
IncidentGraph · provenance preserved · uncertainty explicit · missing evidence stays unknown · consequential use requires human review