Support for svyolr

[strengejacke]

No description provided.

[strengejacke]

@gemini-code-assist review

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds support for svyolr models (survey-weighted ordinal logistic regression) from the survey package. The changes integrate svyolr models with the existing polr model handling patterns throughout the codebase.

• Added test coverage for svyolr model parameters extraction
• Extended existing polr handling to include svyolr models across multiple functions
• Added specific method definitions for svyolr models in the survey methods

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 10 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
tests/testthat/test-svyolr.R	New test file validating svyolr model parameter extraction
R/pool_parameters.R	Extended exception handling and formatting to include svyolr models
R/parameters_type.R	Added svyolr to parameter type checking alongside polr
R/methods_survey.R	Added svyolr method definitions and updated parameter assignment
R/format_parameters.R	Extended parameter formatting to handle svyolr models
R/extract_parameters.R	Added svyolr support in parameter extraction logic
R/dof.R	Included svyolr in degrees of freedom validation
R/1_model_parameters.R	Added svyolr to CI method selection logic
NAMESPACE	Updated exports to include svyolr method
DESCRIPTION	Version bump to reflect new functionality

---

_{Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.}

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds support for svyolr models and includes a number of stylistic code refactorings. The core changes for svyolr support seem correct, leveraging existing methods for similar model types like polr and glm. A new test file for svyolr has been added, which is great for ensuring correctness. However, I've identified a critical syntax error in R/dof.R where a function is closed prematurely, which could lead to incorrect behavior. This should be addressed.