Rewrite your prompt into the native dialect of the model you're actually running — Claude Code or Codex — using that vendor's official rules, and see which rule drove each edit.
The same prompt gets opposite treatment: think step by step is kept for Claude and stripped for Codex reasoning models; double-check yourself is removed on Opus 5 (it self-verifies) but left for Codex. Every suggestion links to the vendor doc it came from.
What's in 0.1.0
improve— rewrite + explain, each edit linked to an official ruledetect— which model you're on, and where that answer came from (settings cascade, VS Code aware,[1m]context suffix preserved, aliases never guessed into a version)rules— every rule with its source, plus the model coverage tableupdate --diff— watches 14 official vendor pages and shows the exact before/after lines; weekly CI opens a PR with that diff- Run-mode advice: when
/goal, plan mode or a dynamic workflow — and an honest "Codex has no/loop" - Claude Code skill,
UserPromptSubmithook, and a Codex skill/plugin
Coverage — Claude: 11 model generations (4 have their own vendor prompting page; the rest run on family rules, not invented ones). Codex: GPT-5.6 family (sol/terra/luna share one official guide).
Zero runtime dependencies, stdlib only, works offline, no API key. 67 tests. See CLAIMS.md for what it does not do.