Skip to content

docs: name the row in release notes while 0.x folds the signal - #186

Merged
electrohyun merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/adr-0019-zero-x-signal
Aug 7, 2026
Merged

docs: name the row in release notes while 0.x folds the signal#186
electrohyun merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
docs/adr-0019-zero-x-signal

Conversation

@electrohyun

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

0019 shifts every row one place to the right below 1.0.0, and says so, but does not say what the shift costs. Two rows that differ above 1.0.0 land on the same number below it, so a 0.x patch can be a delivery correction or a comment typo and the digit does not separate them.

This records where the separation lives instead. Every release below 1.0.0 names the row it landed on, which v0.4.1's notes already do.

It matters for the next one rather than for this one. The emit and on return values are an observable change that the shift puts in a patch, so without this sentence 0.4.2 would be the first release the rule quietly fails to describe.

Related issue

No tracking issue. Follow-up to #177, which is already merged, so it lands as its own pull request rather than a commit on that branch.

Checklist

  • Tests added or updated. Documentation only.
  • Behavior verified against real socket.io. No source change.

@electrohyun electrohyun self-assigned this Aug 7, 2026
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@electrohyun, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 21 minutes

You've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository.

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: d0d6e902-320c-4966-86c4-61520a79be3f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8e6e012 and b169165.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/decisions/0019-what-counts-as-a-breaking-change.md

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Aug 7, 2026
@electrohyun
electrohyun merged commit c15a274 into main Aug 7, 2026
14 checks passed
@electrohyun
electrohyun deleted the docs/adr-0019-zero-x-signal branch August 7, 2026 14:35
@electrohyun electrohyun added the 📏 xs Pull request changes fewer than 10 lines label Aug 11, 2026
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to Done in smocket Aug 27, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation 📏 xs Pull request changes fewer than 10 lines

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant