docs: use GFM footnote syntax for the macOS signing note - #1936
Merged
Conversation
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01KEEZg64JKFrSDAc7u4V4Na
malept
approved these changes
Jul 22, 2026
dsanders11
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 23, 2026 00:10
dsanders11
approved these changes
Jul 23, 2026
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 20.1.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Requested by Samuel Attard, David Sanders · Slack thread
Summarize your changes:
Converts the remaining faux footnote in the README (the macOS / Mac App Store signing note) to GFM footnote syntax. Before: a manual
<sup>*</sup>marker with an italicized note line below the platform list. After: a[^macos]GFM footnote, matching the[^ia32]style introduced in #1935. Wording is unchanged. This is the follow-up @malept requested in his #1935 review.Generated by Claude Code