update subm

[liunyl]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated an internal submodule/dependency. No changes to user-facing behavior, APIs, or public interfaces. Low review effort required.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This PR updates the data_substrate git submodule pointer from commit 7802ebd6554f... to 0ee68ce2451e.... No source code, public API, or control flow changes are included.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Submodule Update data_substrate	Updated submodule commit pointer from 7802ebd6554f4475846a97581afe4be003073423 to 0ee68ce2451e4a0f6a46b37f1d289038279ef4be. No code or API changes.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• No source files changed; verify submodule target commit and CI for compatibility.

Possibly related PRs

• update submodule #174: Advances the same data_substrate submodule pointer to commit 7802ebd..., related by submodule history.
• update subm #185: Also updates the data_substrate submodule pointer to a different target commit; likely part of coordinated updates.

Suggested reviewers

• lzxddz

Poem

🐰 I hopped through commits with a twitch of my nose,

pointer nudged forward where fresh code now goes.
No files were tinkered, no APIs stirred,
just a tiny hop forward — hooray for the herd! 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	❓ Inconclusive	The title 'update subm' is vague and incomplete, appearing to be a truncation of 'update submodule'. It lacks clarity about which submodule is being updated or why.	Expand the title to be more descriptive, such as 'Update data_substrate submodule to fix OOM issue' to clearly communicate the change and its purpose.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3ac6348 and 44fb24f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• data_substrate (1 hunks)

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}