Skip to content

chore: disable scan report - #19

Merged
gabrielfrasantos merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/disable-scan-report
Oct 8, 2025
Merged

chore: disable scan report#19
gabrielfrasantos merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feature/disable-scan-report

Conversation

@gabrielfrasantos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚀 Hey, I have created a Pull Request

Description of changes

✔️ Checklist

  • I have followed the contribution guidelines for this repository
  • I have added tests for new behavior, and have not broken any existing tests
  • I have added or updated relevant documentation
  • I have verified that all added components are accounted for in the SBOM

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings October 8, 2025 08:07

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR disables the scheduled vulnerability scan by removing the cron-based trigger from the vulnerability scan workflow.

  • Removes the scheduled daily vulnerability scan that was running at 2:30 AM UTC
  • Maintains the ability to manually trigger the vulnerability scan via workflow_dispatch

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

⚠️MegaLinter analysis: Success with warnings

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Warnings Elapsed time
✅ ACTION actionlint 19 0 0 0.52s
✅ DOCKERFILE hadolint 2 0 0 0.78s
✅ GHERKIN gherkin-lint 6 0 0 2.29s
✅ JSON npm-package-json-lint yes no no 0.45s
✅ JSON prettier 16 2 0 0 0.51s
✅ JSON v8r 16 0 0 7.9s
⚠️ MARKDOWN markdownlint 9 0 1 0 0.88s
✅ MARKDOWN markdown-table-formatter 9 1 0 0 0.28s
✅ REPOSITORY gitleaks yes no no 1.08s
✅ REPOSITORY git_diff yes no no 0.01s
✅ REPOSITORY grype yes no no 27.23s
✅ REPOSITORY secretlint yes no no 0.99s
✅ REPOSITORY syft yes no no 2.0s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy yes no no 5.29s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy-sbom yes no no 0.25s
✅ REPOSITORY trufflehog yes no no 2.38s
✅ SPELL lychee 70 0 0 11.65s
✅ YAML prettier 25 0 0 0 1.08s
✅ YAML v8r 25 0 0 7.84s
✅ YAML yamllint 25 0 0 0.83s

Detailed Issues

⚠️ MARKDOWN / markdownlint - 1 error
.github/CONTRIBUTING.md:18:7 MD051/link-fragments Link fragments should be valid [Context: "[Found a security vulnerability?](#found-a-security-vulnerability)"]

See detailed reports in MegaLinter artifacts

Your project could benefit from a custom flavor, which would allow you to run only the linters you need, and thus improve runtime performances. (Skip this info by defining FLAVOR_SUGGESTIONS: false)

  • Documentation: Custom Flavors
  • Command: npx mega-linter-runner@9.0.1 --custom-flavor-setup --custom-flavor-linters ACTION_ACTIONLINT,DOCKERFILE_HADOLINT,GHERKIN_GHERKIN_LINT,JSON_V8R,JSON_PRETTIER,JSON_NPM_PACKAGE_JSON_LINT,MARKDOWN_MARKDOWNLINT,MARKDOWN_MARKDOWN_TABLE_FORMATTER,REPOSITORY_GIT_DIFF,REPOSITORY_GITLEAKS,REPOSITORY_GRYPE,REPOSITORY_SECRETLINT,REPOSITORY_SYFT,REPOSITORY_TRIVY,REPOSITORY_TRIVY_SBOM,REPOSITORY_TRUFFLEHOG,SPELL_LYCHEE,YAML_PRETTIER,YAML_YAMLLINT,YAML_V8R

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📦 Container Size Analysis

Note

Comparing gabrielfrasantos/embedded-devcontainer-rust:edgegabrielfrasantos/embedded-devcontainer-rust:pr-19

📈 Size Comparison Table

OS/Platform Previous Current Change Trend
linux/amd64 504.67 MB 544.75 MB +40.09 MB (+7.94%) 🔼
linux/arm64 0 B 501 MB +501 MB (+∞) 🔼

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

📦 Container Size Analysis

Note

Comparing gabrielfrasantos/embedded-devcontainer:edgegabrielfrasantos/embedded-devcontainer:pr-19

📈 Size Comparison Table

OS/Platform Previous Current Change Trend
linux/amd64 0 B 709.8 MB +709.8 MB (+∞) 🔼
linux/arm64 0 B 692.61 MB +692.61 MB (+∞) 🔼

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Test Results

 4 files   4 suites   2m 24s ⏱️
30 tests 30 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌
64 runs  64 ✅ 0 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit a68429d.

@gabrielfrasantos
gabrielfrasantos merged commit 932b64f into main Oct 8, 2025
30 checks passed
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pull Request Report (#19)

Static measures

Description Value
Number of added lines 0
Number of deleted lines 2
Number of changed files 1
Number of commits 1
Number of reviews 1
Number of comments (w/o review comments) 4
Number of reviews that contains a comment to resolve 1
Number of reviews that requested a change from the author 0
Number of reviews that approved the Pull Request 0
Get the total number of participants of a Pull Request 3

Time related measures

Description Value
PR lead time (from creation to close of PR) 24.9 Min
Time that was spend on the branch before the PR was created 34 Sec
Time that was spend on the branch before the PR was merged 25.4 Min
Time to merge after last review 24.7 Min

Status check related measures

Description Value
Total runtime for last status check run (Workflow for PR) 36.1 Min
Total time spend in last status check run on PR 13.8 Min

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🎉 Hooray! The changes in this pull request went live with the release of v7.0.0 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants