Update documentation dropdown#1
Conversation
| <li><a href="http://docs.astropy.org" target="_blank">Current Release (3.1)</a></li> | ||
| <li><a href="http://devdocs.astropy.org/" target="_blank">In Development</a></li> | ||
| <li><a href="https://astropy.readthedocs.io/en/v2.0.9/index.html" target="_blank">v2.0.9</a></li> | ||
| <li><a href="https://astropy.readthedocs.io/en/v3.0.5/index.html" target="_blank">v3.0.5</a></li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Don't update this version to non LTS, but rather 2.0.10
There was a problem hiding this comment.
See comment below. If this is really supposed to be LTS, it should link to http://docs.astropy.org/en/lts/
| <div class="dropdown-content"> | ||
| <ul> | ||
| <li><a href="http://docs.astropy.org" target="_blank">Current Release</a></li> | ||
| <li><a href="http://docs.astropy.org" target="_blank">Current Release (3.1)</a></li> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I know why, but can you explain?
|
IMO, we should either go all-in on putting version numbers in the dropdown, or none. I prefer having the version numbers there as a quick way for users to see what is new / old. But I know @bsipocz is going to push back and say that creates the possibility of the numbers being out of sync. If we take that philosophy, then I suggest instead removing v2.0.9 and instead having "current release", "in development", "long-term support" (and link the last one to http://docs.astropy.org/en/lts/). |
|
I'm all on board with removing 2.0.9 and listing LTS instead, that actually would make things super consistent as those three are the ones we support. We've removed listing more versions just a couple of weeks ago as part of their removal from RTD in order to fix the google search results. |
|
I like the "words only" solution. Will implement that in astropy#286 (and close this once it's in) |
3 participants
This updates the documentation dropdown menu for the new release.