Skip to content

Conversation

@winsvega
Copy link
Contributor

@winsvega winsvega commented Feb 13, 2025

πŸ—’οΈ Description

add access list transaction for filling unit test

πŸ”— Related Issues

Discovered this issue. that eels t8n rejects access list transaction if its chain id 0
not sure if it's a correct behavior

ethereum/execution-specs#1514

βœ… Checklist

  • All: Set appropriate labels for the changes.
  • All: Considered squashing commits to improve commit history.
  • All: Added an entry to CHANGELOG.md.
  • All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
  • Tests: All converted JSON/YML tests from ethereum/tests have been added to converted-ethereum-tests.txt.
  • Tests: A PR with removal of converted JSON/YML tests from ethereum/tests have been opened.
  • Tests: Included the type and version of evm t8n tool used to locally execute test cases: e.g., ref with commit hash or geth 1.13.1-stable-3f40e65.
  • Tests: Ran mkdocs serve locally and verified the auto-generated docs for new tests in the Test Case Reference are correctly formatted.

@winsvega winsvega added the scope:fill Scope: fill command label Feb 13, 2025
@winsvega winsvega requested a review from marioevz February 13, 2025 13:39
@winsvega winsvega changed the title support transaction types in fill unit tests feat(unit tests): support transaction types in fill unit tests Feb 13, 2025
Copy link
Member

@marioevz marioevz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@marioevz marioevz merged commit 38621dc into main Feb 13, 2025
21 checks passed
@marioevz marioevz deleted the tx_type_unit_test branch February 13, 2025 16:23
felix314159 pushed a commit to felix314159/execution-spec-tests that referenced this pull request May 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

scope:fill Scope: fill command

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants