Skip to content

chore: fix struct name#2379

Merged
tac0turtle merged 1 commit into
evstack:mainfrom
xiaoxiangirl:main
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

chore: fix struct name#2379
tac0turtle merged 1 commit into
evstack:mainfrom
xiaoxiangirl:main

Conversation

@xiaoxiangirl

@xiaoxiangirl xiaoxiangirl commented Jun 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Overview

fix struct name

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected a typo in the comment describing the SignatureVerifier type.

Signed-off-by: xiaoxiangirl <caojiaqiao@outlook.com>
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Walkthrough

A comment typo for the SignatureVerifier type in the types/signed_header.go file was corrected. No changes were made to code logic, functionality, or exported declarations.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
types/signed_header.go Fixed a typo in the comment for the SignatureVerifier type.

Suggested reviewers

  • tac0turtle

Poem

A typo hopped into the code one night,
But now it's fixed, the comment's right!
No logic changed, just words anew,
A tiny tweak, a clearer view.
The codebase smiles, the rabbit cheers—
For tidy docs bring happy peers!
🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 golangci-lint (1.64.8)

Error: you are using a configuration file for golangci-lint v2 with golangci-lint v1: please use golangci-lint v2
Failed executing command with error: you are using a configuration file for golangci-lint v2 with golangci-lint v1: please use golangci-lint v2

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
types/signed_header.go (1)

40-40: Fix comment grammar.
The comment reads “custom signature verifiers,” but since it refers to a single function alias, it should be singular “verifier.”

Proposed diff:

-// SignatureVerifier is a custom signature verifiers.
+// SignatureVerifier is a custom signature verifier.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c5ab25 and 1ec7816.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • types/signed_header.go (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Summary

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 71.86%. Comparing base (6c5ab25) to head (1ec7816).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2379      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.72%   71.86%   +0.14%     
==========================================
  Files          64       64              
  Lines        6306     6306              
==========================================
+ Hits         4523     4532       +9     
+ Misses       1381     1374       -7     
+ Partials      402      400       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
combined 71.86% <ø> (+0.14%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tac0turtle
tac0turtle added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 18, 2025
@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Jun 18, 2025
@tac0turtle
tac0turtle added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 19, 2025
Merged via the queue into evstack:main with commit 8b970af Jun 19, 2025
24 of 26 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation Bot moved this to Done in Evolve Jun 19, 2025
@tac0turtle tac0turtle removed this from Evolve Aug 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants