🔖 release: mobile@1.2.16, server@0.2.102

[cruzdanilo]

Releases

@exactly/mobile@1.2.16

Patch Changes

• #1132 08df89b Thanks @dieguezguille! - ✨ implement failed onramp ui

• #1115 6f8e110 Thanks @franm91! - ✨ implement bridge offramp

• Updated dependencies [852799e]:

  • @exactly/server@0.2.102

@exactly/server@0.2.102

Patch Changes

• #1130 852799e Thanks @mainqueg! - ✨ handle failed manteca onboarding tasks

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request bumps the version of @exactly/mobile from 1.2.15 to 1.2.16, updates the changelog to document the implementation of the bridge offramp feature, and removes the corresponding changeset file. There are no review comments, and I have no feedback to provide.

Important

The consumer version of Gemini Code Assist on GitHub is being sunset. Starting June 18, 2026, new organization installations will be blocked, and all code review activity will officially cease on July 17, 2026.
For more details on the timeline and next steps, please review the Help Documentation.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@cruzdanilo, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 41 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f2c3f6f8-8d60-4d39-abe9-a966a7aa1d8d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e3ac3b0 and f0f3659.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)

• pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml

📒 Files selected for processing (5)

• .changeset/calm-dolls-brush.md
• CHANGELOG.md
• package.json
• server/CHANGELOG.md
• server/package.json

Walkthrough

This pull request performs standard release bookkeeping for the @exactly/mobile package: bumping the version to 1.2.16 in package.json, adding a corresponding CHANGELOG.md entry referencing PR #1115, and removing the now-consumed changeset file.

Changes

Release Bookkeeping

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Version bump and changelog entry package.json, CHANGELOG.md, .changeset/calm-dolls-brush.md	Package version bumped from 1.2.15 to 1.2.16, a new changelog section documents the "implement bridge offramp" patch, and the associated changeset file is removed.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• exactly/exa#908: Both PRs are Changesets-driven release updates for @exactly/mobile, modifying package.json's version and adding CHANGELOG.md entries.
• exactly/exa#928: Both PRs touch @exactly/mobile release notes around bridge functionality.
• exactly/exa#1052: Both PRs are release/changeset bookkeeping for the same bridge offramp work.

Suggested reviewers: Mateo-Soso, nfmelendez, dieguezguille

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly indicates a release PR and matches the mobile 1.2.16 bump, though it also mentions a server release not shown in the diff.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch changeset-release/main

✨ Simplify code

• Create PR with simplified code
• Commit simplified code in branch changeset-release/main

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.94%. Comparing base (08df89b) to head (f0f3659).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1140      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.86%   72.94%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files         254      254              
  Lines       10747    10747              
  Branches     3557     3557              
==========================================
+ Hits         7831     7839       +8     
+ Misses       2632     2624       -8     
  Partials      284      284              

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	71.89% <ø> (+0.07%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.