all-your-base: Update outdated comment#1730
Conversation
Update instructional comment to match changes from exercism#469.
|
Hello. Thanks for opening a PR on Exercism. We are currently in a phase of our journey where we have paused community contributions to allow us to take a breather and redesign our community model. You can learn more in this blog post. As such, all issues and PRs in this repository are being automatically closed. That doesn't mean we're not interested in your ideas, or that if you're stuck on something we don't want to help. The best place to discuss things is with our community on the Exercism Community Forum. You can use this link to copy this into a new topic there. Note: If this PR has been pre-approved, please link back to this PR on the forum thread and a maintainer or staff member will reopen it. |
|
Thanks for the issue. Please post on the forum first, as the bot noted, but your input is appreciated. I'm currently syncing all exercises derived from problem-specifications, I'll have a look at this in the process. |
This exercise was revised to use domain specific errors. However, a leftover comment still suggests, that the specific value in Err(.) won't be checked.