[types] cursor should accept arbitrary string#1466
Open
henryqdineen wants to merge 1 commit intofacebook:mainfrom
Open
[types] cursor should accept arbitrary string#1466henryqdineen wants to merge 1 commit intofacebook:mainfrom
henryqdineen wants to merge 1 commit intofacebook:mainfrom
Conversation
|
@henryqdineen is attempting to deploy a commit to the Meta Open Source Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed / motivation ?
This updates the
CSSCursortype to accept arbitrary strings to address a recent bug report. The fix in this PR is to simply addstringto the union type.I personally would prefer the TypeScript union to include
| (string & {})for the improved autocomplete but right now we are generating types from Flow. This article explains the TypeScript trick in more detail. Any objections to maintaining a separate type definitions of the CSS Types so we could use that trick? Have you considered directly usingcsstype?Linked PR/Issues
Fixes #1463
Screenshots, Tests, Anything Else
Pre-flight checklist
Contribution Guidelines