Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
|
Keep in mind that FDS will only compute the radiative heat flux from the hot particle to the solid "ground". There is no conduction from sphere to ground, or convection from the hot boundary layer of the particle to the ground. That being said, one thing that you can do to test the model is to create hot particles with a fixed surface temperature and then contain them within a barrier on the ground. The radiative heat flux to the (cold) ground should approach what one would expect from these hot particles assuming that they eventually cover the area completely. That is, the heat flux would approach |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I am trying to develop a FDS model to investigate whether burning ember-like particles can ignite a combustible surface.
In the model:
A particle (FLYING_EMBER) is defined using a layered surface (EMBER_SURF) with pyrolysis properties.
Particles are continuously injected from a burner located above the target.
A combustible surface is located below, with an assigned material and IGNITION_TEMPERATURE.
However, it is not able to achieve ignition of the target surface.
Before proceeding further, I would like to check whether my modelling approach is fundamentally correct for studying ember-induced ignition in FDS.
I have attached the FDS file for reference.
Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
ember.txt
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions