Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
If something can be done fairly easily using control logic and existing outputs, we generally prefer not to add that as an additional output quantity. We added the CTRL capability in large part to address these types of requests. If you have a fire in a compartment and you close the door, the spike behavior is a result of the instant closing. However, after than if the fire is increasing temperature in the compartment then the pressure will also need to increase until the leakage volume flow catches up with the expansion of the gas due to temperature. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
In some cases, I observe non-physical pressure behavior, such as a positive pressure in a compartment with leakages when all doors are suddenly closed. Developers noted that sudden door closing is not a realistic method, so the pressure measurement behavior was not considered an issue. I could not find a more realistic, feasible-to-build door-closing setup, but there may be a workaround as suggested earlier.
If we subtract the initial value of the device (T=0) than the measured
ABSOLUTE PRESSURE(orBACKGROUND PRESSURE) we get a reasonable reading compared toPRESSURE.This can be done by postprocessing or multiple CTRL, DEVC items in the simulation.
I was wondering if there is another QUANTITY which can perform this in a more simple way without additional steps. Is this possible? If not, could you please consider adding this new quantity?
Thank you for considering its feasibility.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions