Skip to content

Regen mocks and use the new func names#35655

Merged
JordanMontgomery merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
JM-fix-team-mocks
Nov 12, 2025
Merged

Regen mocks and use the new func names#35655
JordanMontgomery merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
JM-fix-team-mocks

Conversation

@JordanMontgomery
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@JordanMontgomery JordanMontgomery commented Nov 12, 2025

Related issue: Related to #35357

No functional changes - regens mocks for #35572

Checklist for submitter

If some of the following don't apply, delete the relevant line.

Testing

  • Added/updated automated tests

@JordanMontgomery JordanMontgomery marked this pull request as ready for review November 12, 2025 21:28
@JordanMontgomery JordanMontgomery requested a review from a team as a code owner November 12, 2025 21:28
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Nov 12, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 66.25%. Comparing base (ad3f9f3) to head (45c224a).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #35655      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   66.22%   66.25%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files        2104     2104              
  Lines      178300   178300              
  Branches     7288     7288              
==========================================
+ Hits       118072   118124      +52     
+ Misses      49412    49357      -55     
- Partials    10816    10819       +3     
Flag Coverage Δ
backend 67.90% <100.00%> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@iansltx iansltx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. We definitely need a CI job to catch this before a PR gets merged.

@JordanMontgomery JordanMontgomery merged commit db29e1b into main Nov 12, 2025
44 checks passed
@JordanMontgomery JordanMontgomery deleted the JM-fix-team-mocks branch November 12, 2025 22:01
JordanMontgomery added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 17, 2025
See
https://github.com/fleetdm/fleet/actions/runs/19313106183/job/55238111566?pr=35663
for an example of what this looks like when it fails

See #35655 for why we need this.
Someone was able to check in code that inadvertently broke things for
other developers. This is similar to why we have the existing "DB" tests
that validate you updated the DB Schema file
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants