Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

Revert "Use iOS scale when computing render buffer size (#4171)"#4175

Merged
cbracken merged 1 commit intoflutter:masterfrom
cbracken:revert-scale
Oct 5, 2017
Merged

Revert "Use iOS scale when computing render buffer size (#4171)"#4175
cbracken merged 1 commit intoflutter:masterfrom
cbracken:revert-scale

Conversation

@cbracken
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@cbracken cbracken commented Oct 4, 2017

This reverts commit d43d353.

Clear regression to the flutter_gallery_ios__transition_perf benchmarks:

  • average_frame_build_time_millis: 1.4x
  • missed_frame_build_budget_count: 1.2x

No regression seen for other iOS benchmarks (e.g. scrolling).

This reverts commit d43d353.

Clear regression to the flutter_gallery_ios__transition_perf benchmarks:
  * average_frame_build_time_millis: 1.4x
  * missed_frame_build_budget_count: 1.2x

No regression seen for other iOS benchmarks (e.g. scrolling).
@cbracken
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

cbracken commented Oct 4, 2017

Reverting while investigating the perf regression to the Gallery frame build benchmark.

@cbracken cbracken requested review from Hixie and chinmaygarde October 4, 2017 23:07
@chinmaygarde
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The build times should only affect the rasterizer. I don't see how this patch affects engine times.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@chinmaygarde chinmaygarde left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It is not clear to me how a change in the rasterizer is affecting build times (and that too only for certain benchmarks). We can revert this patch till we get more traces.

@Hixie
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Hixie commented Oct 5, 2017

LGTM

Feel free to check in reverts with just TBR=

@cbracken cbracken merged commit 459f722 into flutter:master Oct 5, 2017
@cbracken cbracken deleted the revert-scale branch April 27, 2018 17:03
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants