Skip to content

cli: reconcile peer-management UX #12

Description

@fosskar

Both mechanisms are live: namespace tickets (ssync ticket / ssync join <ticket>) do pairing, while the config peers node-id list feeds sync_with_peers resync via discovery. Decide the user-facing story and align docs.

Likely direction: tickets stay the pairing UX, peers becomes plumbing that join populates, plus ssync peer list/remove for hygiene.

Refs: TODO.md Open #5, docs/pairing.md.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    needs-decisionDesign fork; needs a call before implementation

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions