A lifecycle-driven neural training system in which new computational structure is generated from the live state of a host network — not selected from a fixed menu of human-authored blueprints — then conformed, compiled, QA-tested in matched counterfactual branches, adjudicated against doing nothing, embodied reversibly under warrant, and eventually retired.
Status: pre-implementation bootstrap. The design is complete — the HLD (v4.1, Namespec 1.0 — locked) is decomposed into standalone chapters under
docs/design/(ADR-0001) — and the Python scaffold is in place, but no functional code exists yet. First engineering work is Phase A (Namespec, Leyline contracts, dependency boundaries). The project name and the subsystem boundaries are locked (open decisions).
Growing a neural network at runtime raises four questions that existing systems tend to blur together: what new structure to add, whether it is structurally sound, whether it actually helps, and who gets to decide. Simic separates those concerns constitutionally. Structure is designed from live host telemetry; verified and canonicalised; compiled without semantic change; tested in flash-cloned counterfactual branches that share an identical future with the mainline; and admitted only if it beats a mandatory no-op alternative under a provider-blind judge. Everything — including failures, rejected pools, and no-op wins — is retained as history.
Admitted structure is never permanent by default: it matures behind the host, blends in reversibly, must keep earning its tenancy, and is sedated or lysed when it no longer does.
Authority is split across fourteen bounded domains with deliberately vivid
codenames (they act as an architecture linter — a subsystem acting contrary
to its verb is exercising authority it must not have). Three are
infrastructure: Leyline (contracts and the deterministic request
resolver), Tolaria (the single training/execution substrate for mainline
and branches), and Sarpadia (append-only history, ancestry, retrieval).
The other eleven are agents, summarised by the canonical sentence
(docs/design/02-constitution.md):
Nissa observes and reports. Tamiyo plans. Narset commissions and acts. Momir designs. Elesh conforms. Tezzeret compiles. Urabrask tests the compiled result in Tolaria. Augustin judges the resulting evidence under Leyline. Kasmina embodies the admitted growth. Emrakul destroys what no longer earns continued tenancy. Sarpadia retains every precedent. Oona reveals the account.
The architecture deliberately resembles a newsroom
(docs/design/appendices/newsroom.md):
observation, assignment, authorship, standards, production, fact-checking,
publication judgement, and archive are separate desks, because letting one
desk control the whole chain corrupts both evidence and accountability. The
load-bearing routing rule: Nissa sends the photograph directly to the
designer; the assignments editor sends only the assignment brief.
The constitution (docs/design/02-constitution.md)
defines 45 blocking invariants, cited as INV-nn. The spine:
- Determinism (INV-05): identical snapshot + identical future data ⇒ bitwise-identical traces under the Academy execution profile; non-exact profiles carry measured uncertainty instead of pretending.
- Doing nothing is a real competitor (INV-15, INV-16): every admission and tenancy review includes a measured no-intervention branch with policy utility exactly zero; the whole candidate pool may lose to it.
- Tail risk cannot be bought (INV-45): admission is lexicographic — a tail-risk veto precedes utility comparison, and no measured benefit can offset a veto.
- Evidence and judgement never mix (INV-17, INV-18, INV-37): Urabrask (QA) certifies evidence but cannot issue verdicts; Augustin (judge) decides but cannot touch tests — and neither ever sees candidate provenance (blinding by construction).
- No influence without a warrant (INV-26, INV-27): Kasmina cannot raise a growth above zero influence, and Emrakul cannot retire committed structure, without a valid Augustin warrant.
- Complete history (INV-31, INV-36): Sarpadia is append-only and keeps failures and abstentions — never winners-only.
- Observability is inert (INV-35): disconnecting Oona cannot change training.
docs/design/ Canonical HLD chapter set; entry point 00-INDEX.md
docs/adr/ Architecture decision records
docs/product/ Product workspace (vision, roadmap, decisions)
docs/concept/archive/ Archived v4.1 monolith and superseded v2.0 — historical only
ARCHITECTURE.md One-page digest of the system shape (start here)
AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md Orientation digest for coding agents
Target code layout (once implementation starts) is one package per domain
under src/simic/, with authority-boundary tests under tests/ — see
docs/design/ops/repo-structure.md.
Implementation follows Phases A–K, and the minimum viable system is defined,
in docs/design/programme/phases.md.
Python is the working language.
Simic is the third incarnation of this research programme, redesigned around discoveries from ESPER and ESPER LITE. The morphogenetic chassis (reversible slots, staged maturation, lifecycle states) carries over; what changed is that growth is now generated from host state and causally screened against doing nothing, under separated authorities.
Work is tracked in filigree (dashboard at http://localhost:9328 when
running; filigree session-context at session start); design-review findings carry the
hld-review label. The repo also uses the Weft tooling suite — loomweave
(code map), wardline (trust-boundary gate), warpline (change impact), and
legis (governance) — see AGENTS.md for agent-facing instructions.