Adding a second solution with a "for" loop#35299
Conversation
+ adapted some texts to make the whole thing coherent + added some Useful links at the end of the article
|
Please let me know if I could have improved something in this PR. |
thecodingaviator
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please check and make the required changes
|
All done I guess. Thanks! |
|
I had used backticks for marking code, which you've changed to ", please set it back to ` |
|
Right, sorry about that. Should be OK now. Thank! |
|
Sorry to bother you. It's been 10 days and it's still open. Is there a pb? Is it normal ? Thanks for letting me know 😃 |
|
Yup, such waiting times are normal since we are still dealing with a lot of Pull Requests from October last year. We're hierarchically going through the PRs from oldest to latest |
|
OK fine. It's good to know. So I just wait until it's merged. |
|
@codingk8 There is only one PR ahead of yours in terms of the file you changed, but it affects many other files. This means, we are having to review many other earlier PRs (about 20) which affect files on the other PR first. Probably 1-2 weeks out is my guess. |
|
@RandellDawson Do we want the solutions to be named solution 1 and solution 2 or just solutions or intermediate and advanced, like how we have it in the other JS challenges |
|
@thecodingaviator Personally, it does not matter since we have no true policy in the docs about this. As you know, issue #35453 hopes to standardize and create a formal policy around these types of articles. |
|
Thanks for contributing to the freeCodeCamp repository. Congratulations on your first PR! 🎊 Look forward to more contributions from you! |
Update index.md)masterbranch of freeCodeCamp.Closes #XXXXX