Added "Report a Security Incident" topic#932
Conversation
|
@n-boshnakov: The label(s) DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
✅ Deploy Preview for gardener-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
gardener-prow
bot
added
do-not-merge/needs-kind
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds two documentation pages: an FAQ linking to incident reporting guidance, and a "Reporting a Security Incident" guide that outlines pre-report checks, private submission routes (GitHub private report or security mailing list), and steps for already-public vulnerabilities. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Warning Review ran into problems🔥 ProblemsTimed out fetching pipeline failures after 30000ms Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
website/documentation/faq/reporting-security-incident.md (1)
5-5: Prefer a more direct sentence opening.Line 5 can be tightened for readability by removing “In order to”.
Suggested wording
-In order to report a security incident for Gardener, please follow the steps outlined in [Reporting a Security Incident](../security-and-compliance/security-incident.md). +To report a security incident for Gardener, follow the steps in [Reporting a Security Incident](../security-and-compliance/security-incident.md).🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@website/documentation/faq/reporting-security-incident.md` at line 5, Replace the wordy sentence "In order to report a security incident for Gardener, please follow the steps outlined in [Reporting a Security Incident](../security-and-compliance/security-incident.md)." with a more direct opening such as "To report a security incident for Gardener, follow the steps in [Reporting a Security Incident](../security-and-compliance/security-incident.md)." Update that exact sentence in reporting-security-incident.md to remove "In order to" and tighten phrasing while keeping the link target unchanged.website/documentation/security-and-compliance/security-incident.md (1)
9-9: Use stronger wording for unsupported versions.“old version” can be tightened to “outdated version” for clarity.
Suggested wording
-Only supported versions receive patches. If using an old version, verify the issue exists in the latest release before reporting. +Only supported versions receive patches. If using an outdated version, verify the issue exists in the latest release before reporting.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@website/documentation/security-and-compliance/security-incident.md` at line 9, Replace the phrase "old version" in the sentence "Only supported versions receive patches. If using an old version, verify the issue exists in the latest release before reporting." with "outdated version" to improve clarity; update the sentence to read "Only supported versions receive patches. If using an outdated version, verify the issue exists in the latest release before reporting." and ensure surrounding punctuation and capitalization remain consistent.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@website/documentation/security-and-compliance/security-incident.md`:
- Around line 115-123: The CVSS version references are inconsistent: update the
section header or label "Estimated CVSS v3.0 Score" to "Estimated CVSS v3.1
Score" so it matches the example vector "CVSS:3.1/..." and also update the help
link to the CVSS 3.1 calculator URL (replace the 3.0 link). Ensure the heading
"7. CVSS Score (optional)" remains and only the version text and help link are
changed so both references consistently use CVSS 3.1.
- Line 41: The fenced code block lacks a language identifier (triggering MD040);
update the opening fence for the YAML-like security email block to include a
language tag (e.g., ```text) so the block becomes fenced with ```text and ensure
the closing fence remains ```; locate the fenced block around the Subject:
[SECURITY] Vulnerability Report text and add the language identifier to the
opening fence only.
- Around line 194-200: Add blank lines before and after the Markdown tables to
satisfy MD058: insert a blank line between the preceding heading "### Security
Team" (and the prior heading above the first table) and the table starting with
"| Name | GitHub |", and ensure a blank line follows the table rows (e.g., the
row with "Eva Kuhnle-Heck | [`@HeckEK`](https://github.com/HeckEK)") so both
tables are surrounded by empty lines.
---
Nitpick comments:
In `@website/documentation/faq/reporting-security-incident.md`:
- Line 5: Replace the wordy sentence "In order to report a security incident for
Gardener, please follow the steps outlined in [Reporting a Security
Incident](../security-and-compliance/security-incident.md)." with a more direct
opening such as "To report a security incident for Gardener, follow the steps in
[Reporting a Security
Incident](../security-and-compliance/security-incident.md)." Update that exact
sentence in reporting-security-incident.md to remove "In order to" and tighten
phrasing while keeping the link target unchanged.
In `@website/documentation/security-and-compliance/security-incident.md`:
- Line 9: Replace the phrase "old version" in the sentence "Only supported
versions receive patches. If using an old version, verify the issue exists in
the latest release before reporting." with "outdated version" to improve
clarity; update the sentence to read "Only supported versions receive patches.
If using an outdated version, verify the issue exists in the latest release
before reporting." and ensure surrounding punctuation and capitalization remain
consistent.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: a052fd2e-6e71-4418-abfe-be4660fe7393
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
website/documentation/faq/reporting-security-incident.mdwebsite/documentation/security-and-compliance/security-incident.md
gardener-prow
bot
added
cla: no
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
website/documentation/security-and-compliance/security-incident.md (2)
41-41:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 MinorAdd a language tag to the fenced template block.
Line 41 still opens a fenced block without a language identifier, which can fail markdownlint (MD040).
Proposed fix
-``` +```text --- Subject: [SECURITY] Vulnerability Report ---🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@website/documentation/security-and-compliance/security-incident.md` at line 41, The fenced code block that starts the security template (the template block opened at line 41) lacks a language tag causing markdownlint MD040; update the opening fence to include a language identifier (e.g., change the opening ``` to ```text) so the block reads with a language tag and passes linting while preserving the existing template content.
117-123:⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 MinorKeep CVSS references on one version (3.1).
Line 117 and Line 123 use 3.0, while Line 121 uses a 3.1 vector. Please align these to avoid conflicting guidance.
Proposed fix
-**Estimated CVSS v3.0 Score:** +**Estimated CVSS v3.1 Score:** @@ -[Get help: https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.0] +[Get help: https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.1]🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@website/documentation/security-and-compliance/security-incident.md` around lines 117 - 123, Update the CVSS references to consistently use version 3.1: change the heading "Estimated CVSS v3.0 Score:" to "Estimated CVSS v3.1 Score:", update the example vector/comment to use CVSS:3.1 (it already uses 3.1 but ensure formatting matches), and update the help link text/URL from the 3.0 calculator to the 3.1 calculator (replace "https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.0" with the 3.1 calculator URL). Ensure the strings "Estimated CVSS v3.0 Score:", the vector example "CVSS:3.1/...", and the help link are all aligned to version 3.1.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@website/documentation/security-and-compliance/security-incident.md`:
- Line 160: The in-page anchor target "#who-handles-your-report" referenced in
the sentence "The Security Team reproduces the issue and assesses severity. The
[Security Officer](`#who-handles-your-report`) finalizes the CVSS score." is
broken; either add a matching heading with the id/text "Who handles your report"
(so the fragment resolves) or update the link to point to the existing heading
that describes who handles reports (replace "#who-handles-your-report" with the
correct fragment for that existing heading). Ensure the heading text/HTML id
exactly matches the fragment you choose.
---
Duplicate comments:
In `@website/documentation/security-and-compliance/security-incident.md`:
- Line 41: The fenced code block that starts the security template (the template
block opened at line 41) lacks a language tag causing markdownlint MD040; update
the opening fence to include a language identifier (e.g., change the opening ```
to ```text) so the block reads with a language tag and passes linting while
preserving the existing template content.
- Around line 117-123: Update the CVSS references to consistently use version
3.1: change the heading "Estimated CVSS v3.0 Score:" to "Estimated CVSS v3.1
Score:", update the example vector/comment to use CVSS:3.1 (it already uses 3.1
but ensure formatting matches), and update the help link text/URL from the 3.0
calculator to the 3.1 calculator (replace
"https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/3.0" with the 3.1 calculator URL). Ensure
the strings "Estimated CVSS v3.0 Score:", the vector example "CVSS:3.1/...", and
the help link are all aligned to version 3.1.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 23cea7a3-5f26-4ac2-b144-540817f8c8f8
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
website/documentation/security-and-compliance/security-incident.md
|
/lgtm |
|
@HeckEK: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
gardener-prow
bot
added
size/M
|
@donistz: adding LGTM is restricted to approvers and reviewers in OWNERS files. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: donistz, klocke-io The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
gardener-prow
bot
added
lgtm
|
LGTM label has been added. DetailsGit tree hash: 1d3b3185192c46e084c463e23fd87e28a932e7c7 |
4 participants
How to categorize this PR?
/kind enhancement
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds documentation about reporting a security incident:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Part of #923
Special notes for your reviewer:
Summary by CodeRabbit