-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Replace OpenVPN with Wireguard #70
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
Q2/2026This topic is relevant for the hackathon in Q2/2026.This topic is relevant for the hackathon in Q2/2026.area/robustnessRobustness, reliability, resilience relatedRobustness, reliability, resilience relatedkind/enhancementEnhancement, improvement, extensionEnhancement, improvement, extensionteamsize/smallA team of 1-2 people.A team of 1-2 people.
Metadata
Metadata
Labels
Q2/2026This topic is relevant for the hackathon in Q2/2026.This topic is relevant for the hackathon in Q2/2026.area/robustnessRobustness, reliability, resilience relatedRobustness, reliability, resilience relatedkind/enhancementEnhancement, improvement, extensionEnhancement, improvement, extensionteamsize/smallA team of 1-2 people.A team of 1-2 people.
/area robustness
/kind enhancement
/label teamsize/small
Problem Statement: The Gardener VPN implementation between control and data plane currently uses OpenVPN, which is a well-established but somewhat old solution for VPNs. Wireguard is a relatively new, but well-liked contender in the VPN space. It could be possible to replace OpenVPN with Wireguard. As we do not want to spin up a load balancer per control plane (or use one port per control plane) a reverse proxy like mwgp is required.
See: https://gardener.cloud/community/hackathons/2025-06/#%E2%9A%A1%EF%B8%8F-replace-openvpn-with-wireguard
This was started one year ago and should tried to finished in this hackathon.